Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantý


Filed by a Party other than the Registranto


Check the appropriate box:


o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement


o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))


ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement


o

 

Definitive Additional Materials


o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant tounder §240.14a-12



Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
  (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
  (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
  (5) Total fee paid:
         

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
  (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
  (3) Filing Party:
         
  (4) Date Filed:
         

Table of Contents

HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC.    •    PO BOX 730    •    HONOLULU, HI 96808-0730

HEI LOGO

Constance H. Lau
President and
Chief Executive Officer

March 21, 201122, 2012

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

         On behalf of the Board of Directors, it is my pleasure to invite you to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. (HEI). The meeting will be held on HEI's premises in Room 805 on the eighth floor of the American Savings Bank Tower, located at 1001 Bishop Street, Honolulu, Hawaii, on Wednesday, May 10, 2011,9, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., localHonolulu time. A map showing the location of the meeting site appears on page 8575 of the Proxy Statement.

         The accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement describe the items of business to be conducted during the meeting. In addition, we will review certain significant events of 2010that took place in 2011 and their impact on you as a shareholder of HEI. HEI officers and Board members will be available before and after the meeting to talk with you and answer questions.

         Of particular importance, for your attention, this is the firstas we did last year, in which we will be asking our shareholdersyou to submitcast an advisory vote on the Company'sto approve HEI's executive compensation. A description of the Company'sHEI's executive compensation programs, as well as details of the compensation for the Company'sHEI's named executive officers, is providedare described in the Proxy Statement.

         As a shareholder of HEI, it is important that your views be represented.Please help us obtain the quorum needed to conduct business at the meeting by promptly voting your shares.

         The Board and management team of HEI would like to express theirour appreciation to you for your confidence and support. I look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting in Honolulu.



GRAPHIC

 

Recycled


Table of Contents


 

Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
900 Richards Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

 


HEI LOGO

 


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING

Date and Time Tuesday,Wednesday, May 10, 2011,9, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., localHonolulu time.

Place

 

American Savings Bank Tower, 1001 Bishop Street, 8th floor, Room 805, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813.

Items of Business

 

1.    To elect three Class IIII directors for a three-year term expiring at the 20142015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
  2.    To approve the 2011 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan.
3.    To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes onto approve HEI's executive compensation.
  4.    To hold an advisory vote on a resolution approving HEI's executive compensation.
5.3.    To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as HEI's independent registered public accounting firm for 2011.2012.

Record Date

 

March 2, 2011.1, 2012.

Annual Report

 

The 20102011 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is not a part of the proxy solicitation materials, has been mailed or made available electronically along with this Notice and accompanying Proxy Statement.

Proxy Voting

 

Shareholders of record may appoint proxies and vote their shares in one of four ways:

 

•         Via the Internet

 

•         By telephone

 

•         By mail

 

•         In person


 

 

Shareholders whose shares are held by a bank, broker or other financial intermediary (i.e., in "street name") should follow the voting instruction card provided by such intermediary.

 

 

Any proxy may be revoked in the manner described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

Attendance at Meeting

 

Only shareholders of record as of the record date are entitled to receive notice of, attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are registered in street name, you must bring a letter from your bank or broker or provide other evidence of your beneficial ownership on the record date if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.

Important Notice
Regarding the Availability
of Proxy Materials for
the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be
held on May 10, 20119, 2012

 

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.hei.com/proxymatl.html.

  By Order of the HEI Board of Directors.

 

 

March 21, 201122, 2012

 

Chester A. Richardson
SeniorExecutive Vice President, General
Counsel, Secretary and Chief
Administrative Officer

Table of Contents

2012 Proxy Summary

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.


VOTING MATTERS

Matter
Board RecommendationSee Page

Election of Class I Directors

FOR EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE5

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

FOR

28

Ratification of PwC as Independent Auditor for 2012

FOR

72


DIRECTOR NOMINEES FOR CLASS I DIRECTORS

        Each director nominee is elected for a 3-year term by a plurality of votes cast. Each director nominee is a current director and attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committee on which she or he sits.

 
  
  
  
  
 Committee Membership  
 
  
 Director
Since
  
  
 Other Public
Company Boards
Name
 Age Occupation Independent EC AC CC NCGC
Constance H. Lau  60  2006 President & Chief
Executive Officer, HEI
   X        Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

A. Maurice Myers

 

 

71

 

 

1991

 

Ret. Chairman, CEO &
President, Waste
Management, Inc.

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Hawaiian Electric
Company (HEI subsidiary)

James K. Scott, Ed.D.

 

 

60

 

 

1995

 

President, Punahou School

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

EC—Executive Committee
AC—Audit Committee
CC—Compensation Committee
NCGC—Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee


ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        We are asking shareholders to approve on an advisory basis HEI's executive compensation, including our executive compensation policies and practices and the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this Proxy Statement beginning on page 28. The Board recommends a FOR vote because it believes that the compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving the Company's goals of paying for performance and aligning the executives' long-term interests with those of our shareholders. Named executive officer compensation over the past three years, reflected in cash and long-term equity awards, is consistent with and correlates to the Company's performance and earnings over that period.

i


Table of Contents

Company Performance Highlights

        In 2011, we delivered strong financial results and continued to move our business forward. Financial highlights include the following year-over-year comparison:

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC


GRAPHIC

Performance highlights include:

Sound Compensation Program Design Tied to Performance

        The executive officer compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain the key executives who drive our success. Pay that reflects performance and alignment with the long-term interests of our shareholders at a reasonable cost are key principles. We achieve these objectives through a compensation program that:

ii


Table of Contents

Other key compensation features, which reflect best practices, include:

Executive Compensation Elements

Type
FormTerms

Equity

>Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) (performance shares)>LTIP has 3-year performance period with objective performance measures, paid 100% in stock beginning with 2010-2012 performance period

>

Restricted stock units (RSUs)

>

RSUs generally vest 25% per year while employed

Cash

>

Salary

>

Generally eligible for annual increases; competitively market-based

>

Annual performance-based incentives

>

Based on quantitative and qualitative goals

Retirement

>

Pension

>

5-year vesting, with normal retirement at age 65 and options for early and deferred retirement

>

Excess pay plan

>

Provides additional retirement benefits that cannot be paid under the standard pension plan due to Internal Revenue Code limits

>

Supplementary pension (frozen)

>

Frozen as of September 2009, CEO is only participant

Other

>

Limited perquisites

>

Business club membership

        We use competitive market peer company comparisons to determine the amount of each element of executive compensation. The peer companies are used as a reference in determining appropriate pay levels and mix of pay components by benchmarking toward a competitive median and allowing differences to recognize high performers.

Pay for Performance

        Our executive compensation program allows the Compensation Committee and the Board to determine pay based on a comprehensive view of quantitative and qualitative factors designed to produce long-term business success. The alignment between our financial results and executive officer compensation awarded, as described in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" (beginning on page 29 of the Proxy Statement), demonstrates the success of this approach.

iii


Table of Contents

        The following charts, which compare HEI's total shareholder return (TSR) to the total direct compensation (TDC) of HEI's CEO, show a clear correlation between pay and performance. From 2007 to 2010, CEO TDC generally parallels HEI's TSR under both annual and three-year TSR measures. For 2011, the CEO TDC line slopes downward while HEI TSR continues to rise. This further illustrates pay for performance, since the CEO's compensation for the three-year period ending on December 31, 2011 was based on two performance metrics—TSR and HEI 3-year return on average common equity (ROACE)—and the Company arrived short of its performance expectations for HEI 3-year ROACE.

HEI Annual Total Shareholder Return vs
HEI CEO Total Direct Compensation*
HEI 3-year Total Shareholder Return vs
HEI CEO Total Direct Compensation*


GRAPHIC



GRAPHIC

*
In these charts, TDC is comprised of base salary for the year, annual incentive compensation received for the year, long-term incentive compensation received for the three-year performance period ending that year and restricted stock units granted in the year.

        Like CEO TDC, which decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 as illustrated in the charts above, the CEO's total compensation (shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 51 of the Proxy Statement) was lower in 2011 than in 2010. Total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table differs from TDC in the charts above because it includes the change in pension value, which is affected by interest rates and other actuarial assumptions, and the potential value of long-term incentive awards that may be received in the future but not in the year shown in the Summary Compensation Table.


AUDITORS

        We are asking that our shareholders ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2012. Below is a summary of PwC's fees for services provided in 2011 and 2010.

 
 Amount of Fees 
Type of Fees
 2011 2010 

Audit Fees

 $1,995,000 $1,750,000 

Audit-Related Fees

  135,000  110,000 

Tax Fees

  166,000  298,000 

All Other Fees

 —  —  

Total

 $2,296,000 $2,158,000 

iv


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page

About the Meeting

 1

Who can attend the meeting?attend?

 1

What are shareholders being asked to vote on?

 1

Voting Procedures

 1

Electronic Access to Proxy Materials

 1

Who is eligible to vote?

 2

How many shares are outstanding and entitled to vote?

 2

What constitutes a quorum?

 2

How domay shareholders vote?

 2

How do shareholders vote if their shares are held in street name?

 3

How do shareholders vote if their shares are held in the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the HEI Retirement Savings Plan or the American Savings Bank 401(k) Plan?

 3

Can shareholders change their vote?

 3

How many votes are required?

 3

Who will count the votes and are the votes confidential?

 4

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

 4

What happens if the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned?

 4

Director Nominees forProposal No. 1: Election and Continuingof Class I Directors

 5

Director Nominees for Election

6

Nominees for Class III Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 2014 Annual Meeting

5

Continuing Class I Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 20122015 Annual Meeting

 86

Continuing Directors

9

Continuing Class II Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 2013 Annual Meeting

 109

Continuing Class I Director Who Intends to ResignIII Directors Whose Terms Expire at the 20112014 Annual Meeting

 11

Class III Directors Who Are Not Continuing After the Expiration of Their Terms at the 2011 Annual Meeting

12

Proposal No. 1: Election of Class III Directors

13

Corporate Governance

 1413

What are HEI's governance policies and guidelines?

 1413

What is the Board's leadership structure?

 1413

What is the Board's role in risk oversight?

 1514

How does the Board select nominees for the Board?

 1716

Does the Board consider diversity in identifying nominees for the Board?

 1817

How can shareholders communicate with the directors?

 1918

Board of Directors

 1918

Who are the independent directors of the Board?

 1918

How often did the Board meet in 2010?2011?

 2120

Does the Board meet in executive session without management present?

 2120

Did all directors attend last year's Annual Meeting?

 2120

Does the Board evaluate itself?

 2120

Committees of the Board

 2221

What committees has the Board established and how often did they meet?

 2221

What are the primary functions of each of the four committees?

 2321

Director Compensation

 2423

How is director compensation determined?

 2423

Director Compensation Table

 2726

Proposal No. 2: Approval of 2011 Nonemployee Director Stock PlanAdvisory Vote to Approve HEI's Executive Compensation

 28

Compensation Committee Report

28

What are the purposesCompensation Discussion and terms of the 2011 Director Plan?Analysis

 29

New 2011 Director Plan BenefitsExecutive Summary

 31

Equity Compensation Plan Information

3229

Proposal No. 3: Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on HEI's Executive Compensation Process

 33

v


Table of Contents

 
 Page

Proposal No. 4: Advisory Vote on Resolution Approving HEI's Executive Compensation

33

Compensation Program Design Summary

34

Pay-for-Performance

35

Alignment with Shareholder Interests

37

Effect of Advisory Vote

37

Compensation Committee Report

38

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

38

Who were the named executive officers for HEI in 2010?

38

Summary of Results

38

Executive Summary

39

Compensation Process

41

Who is responsible for determining appropriate executive compensation?

 4133

Can the Compensation Committee modify or terminate executive compensation programs?

 4133

Who is the compensation consultant and what is the consultant's role?

 4134

What is the role of executive officers in determining executive officer and director compensation?

 4234

Are "say-on-pay" vote results considered in determining executive compensation matters?

 34

How do HEI's compensation policies and practices relate to HEI's risk management?

 4234

Compensation ProgramPhilosophy

 4336

What is HEI's philosophy with respect toregarding its executive compensation programs?

 4336

WhatHow are the objectives of HEI's executive compensation programs designed and what are they designed to reward?

 4436

Compensation Elements

 36

What is each element of executive compensation?compensation and how does it fulfill HEI's compensation objectives?

 4436

Why does HEI choose to pay each element?

44

How does HEI determine the amount for each element?

 4538

How does each element fit into HEI's overall compensation objectives?

47

Compensation Elements

47

What are the base salaries of the named executive officers?

 4740

What was HEI's 20102011 annual incentive plan and were there any payouts under this plan?payouts?

 4740

What was HEI's 2008-20102009-2011 long-term incentive plan and were there any payouts under this plan?payouts?

 5042

What is HEI's 2009-2011 long-term incentive plan?

54

What is HEI's 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan?

 5444

How does HEI award stock to named executive officers?What is HEI's 2011-2013 long-term incentive plan?

 5644

Do named executive officers receive equity-based awards other than through the long-term incentive plan?

 46

What retirement benefits do named executive officers have?

 5747

CanMay named executive officers participate in nonqualified deferred compensation plans?

 5847

Do named executive officers have executive death benefits?

 5848

Do named executive officers have change-in-control agreements?

 5948

What other benefits do named executive officers have?

 5949

Executive Compensation

 6051

Summary Compensation Table

 6051

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 6453

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 6655

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 6756

Pension Benefits

 6757

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 7060

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 7161

Stock Ownership Information

 7666

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

 7666

Does HEI have stock ownership and retention guidelines for directors and officers and does it have a policy regarding hedging the risk of ownership?

 7767

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 7868

Other Relationships and Related Person Transactions

 7868

Does HEI have a written related person transaction policy?

 7868

Table of Contents


Page

Are there any family relationships between any HEI executive officer, director and nominee for director?

 7868

Are there any arrangements or understandings between any HEI director or director nominee and another person pursuant to which such director or director nominee was selected?

 7868

Are there any related person transactions with HEI or its subsidiaries?

 7968

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 8069

Audit Committee Report

 8069

Proposal No. 5:3: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 8272

Other Information

 8272

How are proxies solicited and what is the cost?

 8272

vi


Table of Contents


Page

What is the deadline for submitting a proposal for next year's Annual Meeting?

 8272

How can business matters be brought before the Annual Meeting?

 8272

How can shareholders recommend or propose persons as nominees to serve on the Board?

 8373

What provisions has HEI made for "householding" and will it provide additional copies of proxy materials upon request?

 8373

Map

 85

Appendix A — Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. 2011 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan

A-1

Appendix B — Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. Categorical Standards of Director Independence

B-175

vii


Table of Contents


Proxy Statement

        HEI is soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled for Wednesday, May 10, 2011,9, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., localHonolulu time, at the American Savings Bank Tower, 1001 Bishop Street, 8th floor, Room 805, Honolulu, Hawaii. The mailing address of the principal executive offices of HEI is P.O. Box 730, Honolulu, Hawaii 96808-0730.

        The approximate mailing date for this Proxy Statement, form of proxy and Annual Report to Shareholders is March 21, 2011.22, 2012. The 20102011 Annual Report to Shareholders accompanying this Proxy Statement is not considered proxy soliciting material.





About the Meeting

Who can attend the meeting?attend?

        Attendance will be limited to:

        If you own shares of HEI Common Stock in the name of a bank, brokerage firm or other holder of record, you must show proof of ownership. This may be in the form of a letter from the holder of record or a recent statement from the bank or broker showing ownership of HEI Common Stock.

        Any person claiming to be an authorized representative of a shareholder must produce written evidence of the authorization.


What are shareholders being asked to vote on?





Voting Procedures

Electronic Access to Proxy Materials

        HEI provides shareholders the option to access its proxy materials via the Internet. In keeping with our efforts to conserve natural resources, this method of delivery reduces the amount of paper necessary to produce these materials and reduces the costs associated with the printing and mailing of these materials to shareholders. On March 21, 2011,22, 2012, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials


Table of Contents


(Notice) will be mailed to certain shareholders and our proxy materials will be posted on the website referenced in the Notice (www.ViewMaterial.com/HEI). As more fully described in the Notice, shareholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or may request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. The Notice and website will provide information


Table of Contents

regarding how to request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis.

        If you currently receive our proxy materials in printed form and would like to receive them electronically in the future, please so indicate on the enclosed proxy, if voting by mail, or by following the instructions provided when using the telephone or Internet voting options described under "How domay shareholders vote?" below.


Who is eligible to vote?

        Only persons who own shares of HEI Common Stock as of the close of business on March 2, 20111, 2012 (the proxy record date) are entitled to vote.


How many shares are outstanding and entitled to vote?

        On March 2, 2011, 94,915,8831, 2012, 96,222,725 shares of HEI Common Stock were outstanding. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share held.held on the record date. Under the Bylaws of HEI, shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.


What constitutes a quorum?

        A quorum is needed to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the shares of HEI Common Stock outstanding on March 2, 20111, 2012 and entitled to vote, and present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, constitutes a quorum. Abstentions and broker votes of uninstructed shares on routine matters (such as ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm) will be counted in the number of shares present in person or by proxy for purposes of determining a quorum. A quorum established for one purpose will apply for all purposes at the Annual Meeting.


How domay shareholders vote?

        Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please take the time to vote. You may vote via the Internet, by touchtone telephone or by mail before the Annual Meeting, or in person at the Annual Meeting. The Internet and telephone procedures are designed to authenticate your vote and confirm that your voting instructions are followed. If you vote via the Internet or by telephone, follow the instructions on the Notice or voting instruction card you received by mail. If you vote by telephone, you will receive additional recorded instructions, and if you vote via the Internet, you will receive additional instructions at the Internet website. You will need to have available the control number on your Notice or proxy/voting instruction card, as applicable, available.applicable.

        Shareholders who vote via the Internet or by telephone shouldnot mail the proxy/voting instruction card.


Table of Contents


Table of Contents


How do shareholders vote if their shares are held in street name?

        If your shares are held in "street name" (that is, through a broker, trustee or other holder of record), you will receive a voting instruction card or other information from your broker or other holder of record seeking instruction from you as to how your shares should be voted.If you do not provide such instruction, your broker or nominee may vote your shares at its discretion on your behalf on routine matters, but not on nonroutine matters. The ratification of the appointment of HEI's independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine matter. The election of directors the approval of the 2011 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan, the advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation and the advisory vote on executive compensation are considered nonroutine matters.Please provide instructions to your broker on how to vote your shares on all fivethree proposals to ensure that your shares will be voted on all proposals at the Annual Meeting.

        You may not vote shares held in "street name" at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker or holder of record.


How do shareholders vote if their shares are held in the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the HEI Retirement Savings Plan or the American Savings Bank 401(k) Plan?

        If you own shares held in the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, the HEI Retirement Savings Plan (including shares previously received under the Tax Reduction Act Stock Ownership Plan) or the American Savings Bank 401(k) Plan, the respective plan trusteesyou will vote thosereceive instructions explaining how to direct your vote. Your shares will be voted according to your directions. For all of these plans, the respective trustees will vote all the shares of HEI Common Stock for which they receive no voting instructions are given will be voted in the same proportion as they votethe shares for which they receive instruction.voting instructions were given.


Can shareholders change their vote?

        If you vote by any of the methods described above, you may revoke your proxy card or vote at any time before the Annual Meeting in one of three ways:


How many votes are required?

        If a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, then:


Table of Contents

        The Board believes that risk oversight is one of the areas in which having an independent Chairman or Lead Director is especially important in order to ensure that views that may differ from those of management are expressed. Since the HEI Chairman attends the meetings of the Board, the subsidiary boards and their respective committees, the HEI Chairman is also in a unique position to assist with communications regarding risk oversight and risk management among the Board and its committees, between the subsidiary boards and their respective committees and between directors and management.


How does the Board select nominees for the Board?

        The Board believes that there are skill sets and qualities and attributes that should be represented on the Board as a whole but do not necessarily need to be possessed by each director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board, thus, considerconsiders the qualifications and attributes of directors and director candidates not only individually but also in the aggregate and in light of the current and future needs of HEI and its subsidiaries.

        The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board assists the Board in identifying and evaluating persons for nomination or renomination for Board service. To identify qualified candidates for HEI Board membership, the committee may consider persons who are serving on its subsidiary boards as well as persons suggested by Board members, management and shareholders or may retain a third-party search firm to help identify potentially qualified candidates. The committee's evaluation process does not vary based on whether or not a candidate is recommended by a shareholder.

        Once a person is identified as a potential director candidate, the committee may review publicly available information to assess whether the candidate should be further considered. If so, a committee member or designated representative for the committee will contact the person. If the person is willing to be considered for nomination, the person is asked to provide additional information regarding his or her background, his or her specific skills, experience and qualifications for Board service, and any direct or indirect relationships with the Company. In addition, one or more interviews may be conducted with committee and Board members and committee members may contact one or more references provided by the candidate or others who would have first-hand knowledge of the candidate's qualifications.qualifications and attributes.

        In evaluating the qualifications and attributes of each potential candidate (including incumbent directors) for nomination or renomination,re-nomination, the committee considers:


Table of Contents

        HEI's financial results are beginning to reflect the Company's strategic progress. In 2010, HEI's consolidated net income was $113.5 million, or $1.21 diluted earnings per share, compared to $0.91 per share in 2009 and $1.07 per share in 2008. With the achievement of major strategic milestones in 2010, HEI was able to improve earnings, maintain its dividend and achieve a 15%our named executive officers' (NEO) 2011 target total return to shareholders for the year, significantly outperforming the Edison Electric Institute Index. Because of the hard work invested over the last few years, both Hawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank have strong business models and strategies that align, more than ever, with shareholder and stakeholder interests. We continue to move forward on key strategic initiatives, building upon our achievements, to continue to improve performance and shareholder value creation in the future.


Executive Summary

        The Compensation Committee recommends total compensation programs for executives of HEI and its subsidiaries, subject to the approval of the Board. In 2010, the Compensation Committee held eight meetings to consider and approve the overall executive compensation program design. The committee held lengthy discussions, with and without management present, regarding best pay practices and trends. The Compensation Committee's focus has been to refine HEI's executive compensation programs by incorporating best practices and aligning executive compensation more directly with shareholder interests.direct


Table of Contents

        In establishing HEI'scompensation (components in chart below) depends on achievement of pre-established performance goals.

GRAPHIC

        The compensation our named executive compensation programofficers earned for 2010,2011 reflects the Compensation Committee was guided by three principles:strong performance summarized above as well as our performance over the three-year period that ended December 31, 2011:

        The following are the major changes to the executive compensation program in 2010:

CEO Compensation and Company Performance Relative to allow executivesPeer Group

        In order to defer certain portionsvalidate our pay for performance philosophy, the Compensation Committee also looks at historical data on various financial metrics for the Company relative to its peer group of companies.


Table of Contents

The chart below shows HEI's approximate percentile ranking versus peers on various metrics in 2010 (the latest period for which information from other companies was available), as well as the approximate percentile rank of HEI's Chief Executive Officer's total direct compensation versus peers.

GRAPHIC

*
In the chart above, CEO Total Direct Compensation is comprised of base salary andfor the year, annual incentive compensation received for the year, the target opportunity of long-term incentives granted during the year and to select a range of investment vehicles (similar to that offered under the Company's 401(k) plan). This new plan will be implemented in 2011.

        HEI has eliminated nearly all tax gross-ups for named executive officers. There are no gross-upsrestricted stock units granted in the change-in-control agreements given to the named executive officers and aggregate payments under the agreements are limited to the maximum amount deductible under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. There are no tax gross-ups allowed on club membership initiation or membership fees. Tax gross-ups of death benefits have been restricted to the executives who have contractual entitlements to such gross-ups pursuant to their participation in the applicable plan prior to September 9, 2009 (the date the death benefit plan was frozen).

year.

        The primary refinement has been to make HEI's executive compensation more performance based. The compensation program applicable to the named executive officers consists of short-term and long-term components. The short-term components comprise base salary and an annual incentive bonus plan, the latter being performance based. Long-term incentive compensation is made up of a long-term incentive plan (which is performance based) and a restricted stock unit grant (which is time vested over four years).        The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that the currentour executive compensation program reflects "best practices"best practices and is structured to encourage participants to build long-term value in the Company for the benefit of its shareholders.


Table of Contentsour shareholders and all stakeholders.


Compensation Process

        The Compensation Committee recommends total compensation programs for executives of HEI and its subsidiaries, subject to approval by the approval of the Board.Board or applicable subsidiary board. The committee has authority tomay retain (or terminate) the services of consultants and advisors to provide advice to the committee. The committee approves, modifies and/or rejectsadvise it in fulfilling its consultants', advisors' or management's recommendations regarding executive compensation programs, including incentive compensation and equity-based plans. The Board approves the actions ofresponsibilities. Each year the committee holds lengthy discussions, with and where the executive is employed by a subsidiary of HEI, the actions of the committee are also approved by the subsidiary board.without management present, to consider best pay practices; evaluate recommendations from its consultants, advisors or management; and approve compensation programs.

        The Board conducts an evaluation ofevaluates the performance of the HEI President and Chief Executive Officer in light of corporate goals and objectives relevant to her compensation. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation consultant, recommends to the Board an executivea compensation package for the HEIHEI's President and Chief Executive Officer based on the Board's evaluation. The independent directors ofconsider the Boardcommittee's recommendation and decide whether to approve the compensation of the HEI President and Chief Executive Officer.package.

        The Compensation Committee reserves the right tomay amend, suspend or terminate any incentive program or other executive compensation program, or any individual executive's participation in such programs. The committee can exercise itshas discretion to reduce or, increase (exceptexcept to the extent an award or payout is intended to satisfy the requirements for deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code)Code, increase the size of any award or payout. In 2010, no portion of any bonus or long-termHEI's incentive compensation paid by HEI or any of its subsidiariesplans and awards are designed to executives was nondeductible undercomply with Section 162(m)., although the Compensation Committee reserves the right to award compensation even when not deductible if it is reasonable and appropriate to do so.

        In making its compensation determinations, the Compensation Committee will consider financial accounting and tax consequences, if appropriate. For instance, as noted above, the committee takes into account tax deductibility in establishing executive compensation. As another example, the committee may determine that there should not be any incentive payout that would otherwise result solely from a new way of accounting for a financial measure. As another example, the committee will take into account tax deductibility in establishing executive compensation, but it reserves the right to award compensation even when not deductible if it is reasonable and appropriate.


Table of Contents

        The Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co. Inc. (Fred Cook & Co.) as itsis the independent compensation consultant since December 2009. The consultant was engaged directly by the committeeCompensation Committee to provide advice and data with respect to executive compensation analyses, benchmarkingmatters. Fred Cook & Co. assists the committee by (i) reviewing and market practices, including to (i) conduct a review ofadvising the committee on HEI's executive compensation policies and practices; (ii) evaluateevaluating and determinedetermining the appropriate selection of competitive peer groups (forfor benchmarking purposes);purposes; and (iii) examineexamining and recommending the compensation components and pay ranges for the named executive officers; and (iv) recommend the appropriate mix of compensation elements and levels for the named executive officers.

        In February 2010,2011, Fred Cook & Co. concluded its executive compensation review on behalf of the Compensation Committee, which included the selection of peer companies for HEI and its subsidiaries and a comparison of HEI, Hawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank executive compensation against executive compensation for such peer companies. After extensive deliberations in committee meetings held over the course of three months, and after receipt of the report from Fred Cook & Co., the Compensation Committeecommittee reached its determinations with respect to the 20102011 compensation for the named executive officers. The results of Fred Cook & Co.'s review and the determinations made by the Compensation Committeecommittee are discussed below.


Table of Contents

        In 20102011 and with the permission of the Compensation Committee, HEI executive officers discussed with Fred Cook & Co. the compensation philosophy of the Company and its methodology and metrics for computing executive incentives. Human resources and finance personnel provided data in response to requests from the requests of the Compensation Committeecommittee and Fred Cook & Co.

        Although the HEIHEI's President and Chief Executive Officer is a director onmember of the HEI Board, she did not participate in any Board decisions impacting her own compensation. However, in her role as HEIHEI's President and Chief Executive Officer, she did review the performance of the other named executive officers and made recommendations with respect to their compensation to the Compensation Committee. In addition, she participatesparticipated in the deliberations of the Board in acting on the recommendations of the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of these other named executive officers.

        The Compensation Committee and Board reviewed and discussed the results of the advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation (commonly referred to as "say-on-pay") from the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The overwhelming majority of our shareholders voted in favor of the resolution approving HEI's executive compensation. Taking into account the level of support received from our shareholders, and responses to data requests fromthe Compensation Committee's view of the effectiveness of HEI's executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee anddid not recommend major changes to HEI's executive compensation program as a result of the vote. On an ongoing basis, however, the Compensation Committee, working with its independent consultant.compensation consultant, reviews best practices and evaluates HEI's executive compensation programs to ensure such programs are structured to promote shareholder interests.

        HEI has anHEI's Enterprise Risk Management function that is principally responsible for identifying and monitoring risk acrossat the holding company and its twoprincipal operating companies,subsidiaries, and for reporting high risk areas to the boards of directors and designated board committees. As a result, all of the HEI directors, including those who serve on the Compensation Committee, are apprised of the risks whichthat could have a material adverse effect on HEI. The Compensation Committee assessed and considered thesepotential risks when establishing HEI's compensation policies and practices and the executive compensation program


Table of Contents

described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The BoardEnterprise Risk Management function conducts an annual risk review of HEI's executive compensation program, and findings from this review are considered by the Compensation Committee havein designing the next year's executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee has concluded that the executive compensation program does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.risk-taking and reported such conclusion to the Board.

        HEI's compensation policies and practices are designed to encourage executive managementexecutives to maximizebuild value for shareholders, while considering its key stakeholders (including customers, employees and regulators), and to discourage decisions that introduce risks that may have a material adverse effect on HEI. The executive compensation program is structured to pay for performance and align the executive officers' interests with shareholder interests, as well as encourage executives to focus on profitability, efficient use of capital, earnings growth and stock price appreciation in both the short and long terms. Because the executive officers are in a position to directly influence HEI's performance, compensation for executive officers involves a significant portionmore than half of their pay that is "at risk" and tied directly to HEI performance—namely, the annual incentive bonus plan and long-term equity-based incentives.incentive plan. In addition, annual equity grants to executive officers in the form of restricted stock units ensure that executives share in both the upside potential and downside risk of any shareholder.

        In structuring the incentive compensation plans and setting the particularmetrics and goals targets and metrics for awards under those plans, the Compensation Committee incorporates the following elements and practices to ensure consistent leadership and appropriate andpromote prudent decision-making among the named executive officers in a manner that requires cooperation and execution without takingencouraging employees to take unnecessary or excessive risks:


Table of Contents


Table of Contents


Compensation ProgramPhilosophy

        The overall objective of HEI's compensation philosophy is reflected in the following key design prioritiesto have compensation plans that govern its executive compensation decisions:enhance long-term shareholder value while considering HEI's other stakeholders, including customers, employees and regulators. The specific goals that satisfy this objective are:

        The compensation programs' objectives of attraction, alignment and cost are designed to be mutually distinct and collectively complete.


Compensation Elements

        The following chart summarizes the components of HEI's executive compensation program and the connection of each component to HEI's executive compensation objectives. Each compensation element is described in further detail in the pages that follow and in the charts and notes in the "Executive Compensation" section of this Proxy Statement.


Table of Contents

        The compensation programs are designed to support HEI's business goals and promote both short- and long-term profitable growth of the Company. HEI's equity plans are used in its executive compensation programs to align executive compensation with the long-term interests of HEI's shareholders. Total compensation for each executive varies with the performance of HEI and its subsidiaries in achieving financial and nonfinancial objectives.

        The following are the primary objectives of HEI's compensation programs:

        HEI's executive compensation elements comprise—

Element
Description
Objectives

CURRENT YEAR PERFORMANCE

Base Salary

Fixed level of cash compensation targeted to peer group median (but may vary based on performance, experience, responsibilities and other factors).Attract and retain talented executives by providing market-competitive base salary.

Annual Incentive

Cash award based on achievement of Company goals during the year.

Awards are at risk because they depend on pre-set performance goals. Poor performance yields no incentive payment.

Combined with base salary, target annual incentive provides a market-competitive total annual cash opportunity.
Motivate executives and pay for performance in financial and nonfinancial metrics designed, over time, to build shareholder value.

Attract and retain talented leaders by providing competitive annual cash opportunity.

Balance compensation cost and return by paying awards based on Company performance.

LONG-TERM COMPENSATION

Long-term Performance-based Awards

Long-term incentive award opportunity based on meeting performance objectives over rolling three-year periods.

Awards are at risk because they depend on pre-set performance goals. Poor performance yields no incentive payment.

Target level of performance is based on peer group median.

Beginning with 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan, awards are payable 100% in shares of HEI stock.
Motivate executives and pay for performance that creates long-term value for shareholders and considers other key stakeholders.

Align executive interests with those of shareholders by focusing on long-term growth and by paying awards in the form of equity.

Attract and retain talented leaders by setting target level to be competitive with peer median.

Balance compensation cost and return by paying awards based on performance.

Annual Stock-based GrantAnnual equity grants in the form of restricted stock units.

Amount of annual grant is a percentage of base salary at market-competitive levels.

Awards vest in annual installments over 4 years.
Align executive and shareholder interests by ensuring executives have a significant personal stake in long-term growth of the Company.

Motivate high business performance.

Retain talented leaders through multi-year vesting.

RETIREMENT, PENSION & SAVINGS

HEI Retirement Plans

HEI and Hawaiian Electric Company executives participate in the defined benefit pension plans and savings plans under the same terms and conditions as all HEI employees.

The HEI Excess Pay Plan enables HEI and Hawaiian Electric Company executives to earn retirement benefits correlated to salary compensation in excess of limits applicable to defined benefit pension plans.
Attract and retain talented leaders by providing retirement income and enhancing long-term employee well-being.

American Savings Bank 401(k) Plan

401(k) plan established to provide retirement savings opportunity for all American Savings Bank employees.Attract and retain talented leaders by providing retirement income and enhancing long-term employee well-being.


Table of Contents

Element
Description
Objectives

HEI and American Savings Bank Deferred Compensation PlansEnable HEI, Hawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank executives to defer portions of cash compensation, with certain limitations. The plan applicable to American Savings Bank executives allows employer matching contributions on certain contributions and allows profit sharing contributions.Attract and retain talented leaders by providing an additional method of saving for retirement and enhancing long-term employee well-being.

OTHER BENEFITS

Double Trigger Change-in-control Agreements

Double-trigger agreements, with 2 to 3 times payment multiples for named executive officers. (Double-trigger = change in control followed by qualifying loss of employment.)Attract and retain qualified leaders capable of a high level of performance.

Encourage focused attention of executives in the change-in-control context.

HEI Executive Death Benefit Plan

Form of insurance that provides benefits to executive's beneficiaries in event of executive's death; frozen to those participants who were employees as of September 2009.Provide peace of mind to enhance long-term employee well-being.

        HEI uses competitive marketThe Compensation Committee focuses heavily on peer companygroup comparisons to determine the amountappropriate compensation for named executive officers. The Compensation Committee benchmarks the elements of each elementnamed executive officer compensation toward the median of executive compensation.the peer group, while allowing individual differences based on an executive's importance to the organization, competency and performance, length of time in the position, execution of strategy, competitive options and retention and succession considerations.

        Peer companies are, companies which, in the aggregate, are similar in business focus, financial scope and valuation, provide similar products and services and are sources for talented employees. Peer companies are selected by the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultantFred Cook & Co. and are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. The resulting peer companies are used as a reference in determining appropriate pay levels and mix of pay components by benchmarking toward a competitive median and allowing differences to recognize high performers.

Peer companies for HEI and its subsidiaries should reflect HEI's diverse businesses. HEI is a Hawaii-based holding company with a unique blend of two regulated operating subsidiaries, a bank and electric utilities. HEI supplies power to 95% of Hawaii's population through its electric utilities, Hawaiian Electric Company and its subsidiaries, Hawaii Electric Light Company and Maui Electric Company, and provides a wide range of financial services to individuals and businesses through American Savings Bank, one of the state's largest financial institutions based on asset size. Among the objectives of the HEI compensation program are (i) to provide differentiated reward strategies among HEI and its operating bank and utility subsidiaries in order to align with specific business needs and talent markets and (ii) to reward performance relative to strategic plans that support shareholder value.

        In Februarylate 2010, Fred Cook & Co. conducted a peer group selection and compensation comparison in which the same utilityseparate peer group would applygroups applied to HEI, and Hawaiian Electric Company and a banking peer group would apply to American Savings Bank for purposes of setting 20102011 compensation.

        HEI's peers were selected from among utilities with primarily regulated operations and with less than 80% regulated assets. The resulting peer group consisted of 23 publicly-traded utilities with annual


Table of Contents

        The following are the HEI and Hawaiian Electric Company peer group companies* in 2010:2011 compensation:

Allegheny Energy Pinnacle West CapitalGreat Plains EnergyNV EnergySCANA
Alliant Energy PNM Resources
Great Plains EnergyIDACORP Portland General Electric
MirantQuestar
Northeast UtilitiesOGE Energy TECO Energy
NSTARAvistaIntegrys EnergyPepco HoldingsUniSource Energy
Black HillsNiSourcePinnacle West Capital Vectren
NV EnergyCleco WisconsinNorthWesternPNM ResourcesWestar Energy
OGE EnergyDPLNSTARPortland General Electric  

        The following are the American Savings Bank peer group companies* in 2010:

1st SourceGreat Southern Bancorp
BancFirstHancock
Bank of HawaiiIBERIABANK
Bank of the OzarksIndependent Bank
City Holding CompanyNBT Bancorp
Community Bank SystemOriental Financial Group
CVB FinancialPark National
Dime Community BancsharesProsperity Bancshares
First Financial BanksharesRepublic Bancorp
FirstMeritUnited Bankshares
Flushing FinancialWestamerica Bancorporation
Glacier Bancorp

*
Some company names have changed and some companies no longer exist due to restructuringstransactions that occurred after the Fred Cook & Co. analyses and peer group selectionsselection was completed.

        Hawaiian Electric Company's peers were chosen from among utilities with primarily regulated operations. The resulting peer group included 18 public utilities with annual revenue generally between one-half to two-times that of Hawaiian Electric Company. Following is Hawaiian Electric Company's peer group* for 2011 compensation:

Allegheny EnergyGreat Plains EnergyOGE EnergyTECO Energy
Alliant EnergyIDACORPPinnacle West CapitalUniSource Energy
AvistaNorthWesternPNM ResourcesVectren
Black HillsNSTARPortland General ElectricWestar Energy
DPLNV Energy

*
Some company names have changed and some companies no longer exist due to transactions that occurred after the Fred Cook & Co. peer group selection was completed.

        American Savings Bank's peers were selected from among high-performing regional banks and thrifts. The resulting peer group included 21 regional banks and thrifts with total assets generally between one-half and two-times that of American Savings Bank. Following is American Savings Bank's peer group for 2011 compensation:


1st SourceDime Community BancsharesIndependent Bank
BancFirstFirst FinancialNBT Bancorp
Bank of HawaiiFlushing FinancialPark National
Bank of the OzarksGlacier BancorpProsperity Bancshares
City Holding CompanyGreat Southern BancorpRepublic Bancorp
Community Bank SystemHancockUnited Bankshares
CVB FinancialIBERIABANKWestamerica Bancorporation

Table        The results of ContentsFred Cook & Co.'s review revealed that the 2011 target total direct compensation (comprised of 2011 base salary, 2011 target annual incentive, 2011-2013 target long-term incentive and 2011 restricted stock unit grant) for the Chief Executive Officer and all named executive officers except for the Chief Financial Officer were at approximately median, with the Chief Financial Officer's 2011 target total direct compensation between the median and 75th percentile.

        WithIn addition to using the assistance of its compensation consultant,above peer groups as a reference, the Compensation Committee reviews eachconsiders other factors in developing the amount of compensation, element to determine whether it fits into HEI's overall compensation objectives. The committee also requests that, at least annually, management prepare and the consultant review tally sheets on each executive officer to determine how each executive's elements of pay—such as base salary, annual incentives, benefits and long-term incentives—compared to executives in functionally comparable positions at peer companies. The Compensation Committee uses this information to consider whether any element should be reduced or increased or whether the mix of elements should be changed.

        The Compensation Committee also reviewsincluding internal equity among the named executive officers, when developing pay recommendations.individual and Company performance, experience and other matters. The Compensation Committee believes that the comparative compensation among the named executive officers is fair, considering job scope, experience, value to the organization and duties relative to the


Table of Contents

other named executive officers.officers, and that the total compensation for the named executive officers is appropriate given the needs of the Company, the experience, responsibilities, competencies and performance of the executive team and market comparisons.


(1)
The Board approved a base salary increase of $13,000, or 2.9%, for Mr. Schools voluntarily resignedAjello in September 2010.February 2011 and an additional $45,000 increase in July 2011, bringing his annualized base salary to $500,000.

(2)
Mr. WackerWacker's base salary was hired bynot increased for 2011 because his salary had recently been set when he joined American Savings Bank as President and Chief Executive Officer onin November 15, 2010 and received an annualized base salary of $550,000.2010.

        HEI named executive officers have the opportunity to earn an annual cash incentive award based on the achievement of performance goals during the year. Goals under HEI's annual incentive plan, is known as the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP). For, are designed to (i) focus executives on building fundamental earnings in a controlled risk manner to support the 2010continued payment of the HEI dividend, (ii) promote nonfinancial goals important to HEI's stakeholders and (iii) motivate executives and encourage their commitment to HEI's success. Award ranges are determined in comparison to competitive peers to assist in attracting and retaining high-caliber executives.


Table of Contents

        Award ranges.    Following are the 2011 EICP named executive officer award ranges established by the Compensation Committee in February 2011, shown as a percentage of annual base salary as of January 3, 2011:

Name
 Minimum
Threshold
 Target Maximum

Constance H. Lau

 45% 90% 180%

James A. Ajello

 30% 60% 120%

Chester A. Richardson

 25% 50% 100%

Richard M. Rosenblum

 35% 70% 140%

Richard F. Wacker

 40% 80% 160%

        Metrics, goals and results.    In February 2011, the Compensation Committee and Board established minimum thresholds for each of the2011 EICP financial and other operational goals of the annual executive incentive plan designed to align management decisions with shareholder value.metric. The table below lists the named executive officer performance metrics, weightings, minimum thresholds, and target and maximum goals and results for the 2010 annual incentive compensation plan.2011 EICP. The executives listed together below shared the same goals.

        The 2011 EICP metrics in the chart below were chosen because advancement in those metrics correlates with strengthened financial condition, improvements that benefit our stakeholders, including customers and employees, and, over time, growth in shareholder value. Unless otherwise specified, throughoutreferences in this Proxy Statement a reference to utility goals means consolidated goals of the utilities, which include Hawaiian Electric Company and its subsidiaries, Maui Electric Company and Hawaii Electric Light Company.


Table of Contents

        In setting Mr. Schools' goals, the Compensation Committee determined to exclude one-time charges such as severance and lease buyouts in light of American Savings Bank's aggressive performance improvement project to reduce its cost structure and improve its efficiency, profitability and go-forward earnings. The committee, however, retained the discretion to reduce any such award if the resulting payout was not in the best interest of HEI and its shareholders. In setting goals for the other named executive officers, the committee also determined that any adjustments made at American Savings Bank and Hawaiian Electric Company would also be applied for purposes of calculating HEI metrics.

Name
 Weight Performance
Metric
 Minimum
Threshold
 Target
Goal
 Maximum
Goal
Constance H. Lau
James A. Ajello
Chester A. Richardson
  50%HEI Return on Average Common Equity 7.2% 7.9% 8.5%
   50%HEI Net Income $105 million $115 million $125 million
           
   100%       
           
             
Richard M. Rosenblum  15%HEI Net Income $105 million $115 million $125 million
             
   15%HEI Return on Average Common Equity 7.2% 7.9% 8.5%
             
   40%Utility Net Income $75 million $80 million $85 million
             
   10%Utility Safety (Total Cases Incident Rate) 3.20 2.41 1.41
             
   10%Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative (HCEI) Meet minimum project milestones Meet target project milestones Meet maximum project milestones
             
   10%Utility Customer Satisfaction 76.6% 78.2% 82.0%
           
   100%       
           
             
Timothy K. Schools
Richard F. Wacker
  50%Bank Return on Assets 1.00% 1.10% 1.20%
             
   50%Bank Net Income $50 million $55 million $60 million
           
   100%       
           

        The above goals were set by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board in 2010 because they were believed to provide the necessary incentives to properly align executive compensation with achievement of performance goals that enhance shareholder value. HEI's goals of net income and return on average common equity and net income are determined on a consolidated basis, and are thus impacted by the results from both American Savings Bank and Hawaiian Electric Company.

 
 
 Metric and Weighting (%)
  
 Minimum
Threshold

  
 Target
  
 Maximum
  
 Result
  
   Constance H. Lau, James A. Ajello, Chester A. Richardson        
   HEI Return on Average Common Equity (1) (50%)   8.5%   9.7%   10.5%   9.5%
(between minimum and target)
  
   HEI Net Income (2) (50%)   $132 million   $149 million   $160 million   $144 million
(between minimum and target)
  
   Richard M. Rosenblum                  
   Utility Net Income (2) (40%)   $98 million   $109 million   $120 million   $105.7 million
(between minimum and target)
  
   Operations & Maintenance Expense Management (3) (20%)   $420 million   $400 million   $380 million   $373.8 million
(maximum)
  
   Utility Safety (4) (15%)   2.41   1.85   1.30   1.99
(between minimum and target)
  
   Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative (5) (15%)   Meet minimum milestones   Meet target milestones   Meet maximum milestones   Met target milestones  
   Utility Customer Satisfaction (6) (10%)   52nd percentile   54th percentile   56th percentile   21st percentile (below minimum)  
   Richard F. Wacker                  
   Bank Return on Assets (7) (40%)   1.05%   1.15%   1.25%   1.23%
(between target and maximum)
  
   Bank Net Income (2) (60%)   $54 million   $60 million   $64 million   $59.8 million  
(1)
HEI Return on Average Common Equity is calculated by dividing HEI's generally accepted accounting principle (GAAP) net income, as adjusted for Compensation Committee-approved exclusions allowed for Hawaiian Electric

Table of Contents

(2)
Mr. Wacker was eligible to participate in the annual incentive plan prorated for American Savings Bank's actual performance and actual days worked from his date of hire in November 2010.

        HEI's adjusted net income, after excluding from HEI consolidated net income $272,000 of committee-approved exclusions for severance expenses and lease buyouts related to the performance improvement project, was $113.8 million, which exceeds the 2010 minimum threshold of $105 million, and its adjusted return on common equity was 7.8%, which exceeds the minimum 2010 threshold of 7.2%. As a result, named executive officers Ms. Lau and Messrs. Ajello and Richardson received awards for performance between the minimum threshold and target goal levels. Mr. Rosenblum's bonus was impacted in part because 30 percent of his goals were based on achievement of HEI goals, with the other 70 percent being based on utility goals.

        In 2010, the utility met the following annual incentive goals:


Table of Contents

        With respect to the goals for Messrs. Schools and Wacker,Assets is American Savings Bank's return onGAAP net income divided by its average total assets after approved exclusions for severance expenses and lease buyouts related to the performance improvement project, was 1.21%, which was atperiod. Average total assets is calculated by averaging the maximum leveldaily total assets for that performance metric, and its net income was $58.7 million, which was between the target goal and maximum level for that performance metric. The Compensation Committee concluded that it was appropriate to recognize the outstanding performance of American Savings Bank executiveseach day in completing the bank's aggressive multi-year performance improvement project. As a result of American Savings Bank's performance, Messrs. Schools and Wacker received an award based on performance at a level between the target and maximum levels. Mr. Schools had earlier agreed to remain with the bank until the performance improvement project was substantially completed. After the project's completion in August 2010, the Company agreed to a September departure by Mr. Schools but with credit for a full year's service in 2010 for purposes of the incentive compensation programs in recognition of his leadership in completing the bank's performance improvement initiative. Mr. Wacker, who was hired on November 15, 2010, received an award prorated for the days worked in 2010.

period.

        As a result of achieving the aforementioned goals at theperformance levels indicated in the chart above, in February 2012 the Compensation Committee and Board approved in February 2011 the payment of the following 20102011 annual incentive awards to the named executive officers:

Name
 Payout 

Constance H. Lau

 $625,202 

James A. Ajello

 $203,830 

Chester A. Richardson

 $166,770 

Richard M. Rosenblum

 $282,037 

Timothy K. Schools

 $824,032 

Richard F. Wacker

 $103,851 
Name
Payout

Constance H. Lau

$649,004

James A. Ajello

$251,505

Chester A. Richardson

$164,043

Richard M. Rosenblum

$430,355

Richard F. Wacker

$577,346

        HEI named executive officers have the opportunity to earn awards under HEI's three-year performancelong-term incentive plan is otherwise known as the Long-Term Incentive Plan and provides awards measured(LTIP) based on meeting or exceeding performance goals over rolling three-year performance periods. In 2008,The three-year performance periods provide balance with the Compensation Committee approved the following award ranges, shown as a percentageshorter-term focus of the salary midpoint (the middle salary levelannual incentive program. In addition, the overlapping three-year performance periods encourage sustained high levels of performance because at any one time three separate potential awards are affected by current performance. These incentives also are intended to have a favorable retention impact on executives due to their long-term nature. The 2009-2011 LTIP awards described below were paid in a salary range for a particular job grade or position), formix of cash (60%) and HEI stock (40%). Beginning with the following2010-2012 performance period, LTIP awards will be paid 100% in HEI namedstock to align executive officers who were participants in the 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan:incentives even more closely with shareholder interests.

Name
 Minimum Target Maximum Super Maximum 

Constance H. Lau

  65% 130% 260% n/a 

Chester A. Richardson (1)

  30% 60% 120% n/a 

Timothy K. Schools (2)

  40% 80% 100% 175%

(1)
Mr. Richardson's 2008-2010 long-term incentive award was prorated based on 14 months at his HEI Vice President-General Counsel salary midpoint and 22 months at his HEI Senior Vice President-General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer salary midpoint.

(2)
Mr. Schools' 2008-2010 long-term incentive award was prorated based on one month at his American Savings Bank Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer salary midpoint and 35 months at his President salary midpoint.

Table of Contents

        Award ranges.    In addition to the minimum, target and maximum levels, the American Savings Bank 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan also has a super maximum level. This additional level was included for this performance period to focus Mr. Schools and the other American Savings Bank executives on achieving the highest established goals for net income, return on assets and efficiency ratio, and was established for American Savings Bank executives in recognition for the extraordinary work that needed to be achieved by the bank in a short period to improve its performance.

        In addition to the basic long-term incentive plan,February 2009, the Compensation Committee also approved supplemental long-term incentiveestablished the following award levelsranges for the 2008-2010 period for each of the above-named executive officers so that HEI's long-term incentive program would be even more performance-based. Rather than providing restricted stock awards at the levels given in 2007, the Committee reduced the restricted stock awards given to the named executive officers and provided an additional supplemental long-term incentive opportunity, using the same goals, metrics and exclusions asparticipating in the 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan. Payment2009-2011 LTIP, shown as a percentage of any awards made under this supplemental program would be paid in a combinationannual base salary as of 50% cash and 50% stock (versus 60% cash and 40% stock for the basic long-term incentive plan) to promote greater stock ownership and alignment with shareholder interests. The following are the award levels for these supplemental incentives:January 1, 2009:

Name
 Minimum Target Maximum  Minimum
Threshold
 Target Maximum

Constance H. Lau

 13.5% 27% 54% 70% 140% 280%

Chester A. Richardson (1)

 6.5% 10% 20%

Timothy K. Schools (2)

 10% 20% 42%

James A. Ajello

 40%   80% 160%

Chester A. Richardson

 35%   70% 140%

Richard M. Rosenblum

 45%   90% 180%

(1)
Mr. Richardson's supplemental 2008-2010 long-term incentive award was prorated based on 14 months at his HEI Vice President-General Counsel salary midpoint

        Metrics, goals and 22 months at his HEI Senior Vice President-General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer salary midpoint.

(2)
Mr. Schools' supplemental 2008-2010 long-term incentive award was prorated based on one month at his American Savings Bank Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer salary midpoint and 35 months at his President salary midpoint.

        Messrs. Ajello, Rosenblum and Wacker did not participate inresults.    As with the 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan and supplemental 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan because they became employed at their respective companies after2011 EICP, the start of thisCompensation Committee established minimum thresholds for each 2009-2011 LTIP performance period.


Table of Contents

metric. The table below shows the performance metrics, weightings, minimum threshold,thresholds, target maximum and super maximum goals and results for the 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan and supplemental 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan.2009-2011 LTIP. The executives listed together below shared the same goals.

Name
 Weight Performance
Metric
 Minimum
Threshold
 Target
Goal
 Maximum
Goal
 Super
Maximum
Goal
Constance H. Lau
Chester A. Richardson
  40%HEI Total Return to Shareholders 30th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index (1) 50th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index (1) 70th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index (1) n/a
               
   15%Utility Free Cash Flow (2) ($24.1 million) ($13.0 million) ($1.8 million) n/a
               
   15%Utility Return on Average Common Equity (3) 90% of consolidated allowed rate of return on equity less 50 basis points 95% of consolidated allowed rate of return on equity less 50 basis points 100% of consolidated allowed rate of return on equity less 50 basis points n/a
               
   15%Bank Net Income (4) $55.277 million $57.053 million $62.025 million n/a
               
   15%Bank Return on Assets (4) 0.789% 0.816% 0.885% n/a
             
   100%         
             
               
Timothy K. Schools  40%Bank Net Income (4) $55.277 million $57.053 million $62.025 million $68.082 million
               
   30%Bank Return on Assets (4) 0.789% 0.816% 0.885% 0.952%
               
   30%Bank Efficiency Ratio (4) 65.47% 64.83% 63.20% 61.16%
             
   100%         
             

(1)
The Edison Electric Institute is an association of U.S. investor-owned electric companies that are representative of companies that are comparable investment alternatives to HEI. The Institute's members serve 95% of the ultimate customers Mr. Wacker did not participate in the investor-owned segment of the industry and represent approximately 70% of the U.S. electric power industry. The three-year Edison Electric Institute Index measures performance data for U.S. investor-owned electric utilities. The performance of the companies2009-2011 LTIP because he joined American Savings Bank in the index is calculated on a noncapitalized weighted basis so as not to give a disproportionate emphasis to the larger companies. Companies are added to or deleted from the three-year index through acquisitions or merger or other changes in ownership. The Edison Electric Institute includes a company in the index when it has three years of consistent comparable data in comparison to the peer group. HEI uses its ranking in the Edison Electric Institute Index to determine how well it performed in the three-year performance period

Table of Contentslate 2010.

    based on total return to shareholders. In 2010, the following companies were in the three-year Edison Electric Institute Index:



Allegheny Energy
ALLETE
Alliant Energy
Ameren
American Electric Power
Avista
Black Hills
Centerpoint Energy
Central Vermont Public
    Service
CH Energy Group
CLECO
CMS Energy
Consolidated Edison
Constellation Energy Group
Dominion
DPL
DTE Energy
Duke Energy
Edison International
El Paso Electric
The Empire District Electric
Entergy
Exelon
First Energy
Great Plains Energy
Hawaiian Electric Industries
IDACORP
Integrys Energy Group
MDU Resources Group
MGE Energy
NEXTERA Energy
NiSource
Northeast Utilities
NorthWestern Energy
NSTAR
NV Energy
OGE Energy
Otter Tail
Pepco Holdings
PG&E
Pinnacle West Capital
PNM Resources
Portland General Electric
PPL
Progress Energy
Public Service Enterprise
    Group
Scana
Sempra Energy
Southern
TECO Energy
UIL Holdings
UniSource Energy
Unitil
Vectren
Westar Energy
Wisconsin Energy
Xcel Energy

(2)
The three-year performance measure of Utility Free Cash Flow will equal the average of each year's actual results. Utility Free Cash Flow is equal to: Net Cash provided by Operating Activities minus Net Capital Expenditures.

(3)
The performance measure of Utility Return on Average Common Equity (ROACE) will be based on the relationship between Hawaiian Electric Company's consolidated ratemaking ROACE and its weighted-average consolidated allowed rate of return (to be determined by returns allowed per the most recent interim or final Public Utilities Commission decision in effect) less 50 basis points for each of the three years. The minimum or better must be achieved in at least two of the three years in the performance period.

(4)
Results measured in the third year of the performance period.

        The abovemetrics and goals below were set by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board in 2008,2009 because they were believed to provide the necessary incentives to align executive compensation with the creation of long-term shareholder value. The minimum performance levelsthresholds reflected what the Compensation Committee believed to be investors' minimum expectations relative to other investment opportunities and the maximum goal provided greater upside potential for performance stretch goals. Each goal was aligned with HEI's or the operating company'sHawaiian Electric Company's strategic plan and determined by the Compensation Committee to be sufficiently difficult toat a level which, if achieved, would be worthy of a bonus.the incentive compensation.

 
 
 Metric and Weighting (%)
  
 Minimum
Threshold

  
 Target
  
 Maximum
  
 Result
  
   Constance H. Lau, James A. Ajello, Chester A. Richardson        
   HEI Total Shareholder Return (TSR) as percentile of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Index (1) (60%)   30th percentile   50th percentile   70th percentile   31st percentile  
   HEI Return on Average Common Equity (ROACE) (2) (40%)   9.1%   10.1%   11.1%   8.4% (below minimum)  
   Richard M. Rosenblum                  
   HEI TSR as percentile of EEI Index (1) (60%)   30th percentile   50th percentile   70th percentile   31st percentile  
   HEI ROACE (2) (20%)   9.1%   10.1%   11.1%   8.4% (below minimum)  
   Utility ROACE as % of consolidated allowed rate of return on equity (3) (20%)   90%   95%   100%   64% (below minimum)  
(1)
TSR is based on the relationship between HEI's three-year total return to shareholders was 19% and HEI ranked in the 75th percentilethat of the Edison Electric Institute Index, which was above(EEI) Index. TSR is the maximum level for that performance metric. As a result, named executive officers Ms. Lau and Mr. Richardson received awards atsum of the maximum level for the portion of incentive compensation correlated to that performance measure.

        Net income, return on assets and efficiency ratio are standard measurements used by banks to gauge performance. American Savings Bank's results for these goals were measuredgrowth in the third yearprice per share of HEI Common Stock from the beginning of the performance period to incent bank executives in pursuing its aggressive performance improvement project because the results of these improvements would be fully achieved toward the end, plus dividends paid during the period, assuming reinvestment, divided by the beginning price of HEI Common Stock. The EEI is an association of U.S. shareholder-owned electric companies that are representative of comparable investment alternatives to HEI. The EEI's members serve 95% of the three-year performance period. American Savings Bank's net income after approved exclusions for severance expenses and lease buyouts of $272,000 related to the performance improvement project was $58.7 million, bank return on assets was 1.21%, and its efficiency ratio was 56%. As a result of American Savings Bank's performance, Ms. Lau and Mr. Richardson received an award based on

ultimate

Table of Contents


    performance at a level betweencustomers in the targetshareholder-owned segment of the industry and maximum levels forrepresent approximately 70% of the U.S. electric power industry. The following companies were in the three-year EEI Index in 2011:

ALLETE
Alliant Energy
Ameren
American Electric Power
Avista
Black Hills
Centerpoint Energy
Central Vermont Public
    Service
CH Energy Group
CLECO
CMS Energy
Consolidated Edison
Constellation Energy  Group
Dominion Resources
DTE Energy
Duke Energy
Edison International
El Paso Electric
The Empire District
    Electric
Entergy
Exelon
First Energy
Great Plains Energy
Hawaiian Electric  Industries
IDACORP
Integrys Energy Group
MDU Resources Group
MGE Energy
NEXTERA Energy
NiSource
Northeast Utilities
NorthWestern Energy
NSTAR
NV Energy
OGE Energy
Otter Tail
Pepco Holdings
PG&E
Pinnacle West Capital
PNM Resources
Portland General Electric
PPL
Progress Energy
Public Service Enterprise
    Group
Scana
Sempra Energy
Southern
TECO Energy
UIL Holdings
UniSource Energy
Unitil
Vectren
Westar Energy
Wisconsin Energy
Xcel Energy
(2)
HEI ROACE is the ratio of average net income and at(which is HEI GAAP net income, adjusted for any exclusions authorized by the maximum level for bankCompensation Committee) over the three-year performance period divided by average common equity as measured from the beginning to the end of the performance period.

(3)
Utility ROACE as a percentage of allowed return is measured as the average consolidated return on assetsaverage common equity for the long-term incentive planthree-year period compared to the average consolidated allowed return on common equity as determined by the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission for the three-year performance period.

        In February 2009, when the 2009-2011 LTIP award opportunities were established, the HEI Compensation Committee and Board determined that the supplemental long-term incentive plan. Mr. Schools received an award opportunities would be defined 60% in cash and 40% in HEI Common Stock, with the number of shares of stock determined based on performance at a level between target and maximumthe price of HEI Common Stock on the date the 2009-2011 award opportunities were established. In accordance with these determinations, the 2009-2011 LTIP award payouts for the net income goal for the long-term incentive plan and at a level between minimum and target for the net income goal for the supplemental long-term incentive plan. He received an award at the super maximum level for the return on assets and efficiency ratio goals for the long-term incentive plan and at the maximum level for the return on assets and efficiency ratio goals for the supplemental long-term incentive plan. Mr. Schools had earlier agreed to remain with American Savings Bank until the performance improvement project was substantially completed. After the project's completion in August 2010, the Company agreed to a September 2010 departure by Mr. Schools but with credit for the full three years of service for purposes of the 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan programs to recognize his outstanding performance in completing the bank's aggressive performance improvement effort.

        The utility average annual free cash flow was $3.0 million, which was at the maximum level. As a result,HEI named executive officers Ms. Lauwho participated in the plan included both cash and Mr. Richardson received an award basedstock (plus accrued dividends less applicable taxes).

        Despite HEI and the utilities' strong performance in 2011, the improvement in HEI and Utility ROACE over the three-year period was slower than anticipated. Based on the maximum level for that performance measure.

        A higher total return to shareholders and increased American Savings Bank net income, return on assets and efficiency ratio benefit shareholders of HEI, employees and customers by increasing the overall financial strengthachievement of the HEI enterprise. Because of the achievement of these goals at theperformance levels indicated in the chart above, onin February 4, 20112012 the Compensation Committee approved the following long-term incentive awards under the 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan2009-2011 LTIP for the following named executive officers who were in the plan, payable 60% in cash and 40% in shares of HEI Common Stock:officers:

Name
 Total Payout 

Constance H. Lau

 $1,614,618 

Chester A. Richardson

 $340,113 

Timothy K. Schools

 $757,362 
Name
Cash PayoutStock Payout*

Constance H. Lau

$204,2188,015 shares

James A. Ajello

  $62,4752,451 shares

Chester A. Richardson

  $42,5211,668 shares

Richard M. Rosenblum

  $98,6583,872 shares

        In addition,


*
Dividends accrued during the Compensation Committee also approvedperiod on the following supplemental long-term incentive awards payable 50% in cash and 50% innumber of shares of HEI Common Stock:

Name
 Total Payout 

Constance H. Lau

 $335,344 

Chester A. Richardson

 $56,685 

Timothy K. Schools

 $162,048 


    What is HEI's 2009-2011 long-term incentive plan?

        HEI's 2009-2011 long-term incentive plan was explained in the proxy statement for HEI's 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

listed.

        The Compensation Committee modified the design of the long-term incentive plan from the 2009-2011 performance period for the 2010-2012 performance period based on Company strategy and recommendations of Fred Cook & Co. after its executive compensation review. Awards under theHEI's 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan generallywas explained in the proxy statement for HEI's 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

        In accordance with design changes made by the Compensation Committee beginning with the 2010-2012 LTIP, awards under the 2011-2013 LTIP will be paid 100% in shares of HEI Common Stock


Table of Contents

(plus accrued dividends less applicable taxes with thetaxes). The potential number of shares to be issuedwas determined at the beginning of the performance period instead of at the time of the payment of the award. The number of shares was determined by the Compensation Committee based on the participant's salary at the beginning of the performance period and the fair market value of HEI Common Stock on the date the award opportunity was established. The Compensation Committee believes that setting a fixed number of shares determined at the beginning of the performance period, rather than a number of shares determined bybased on the dollar value of the award divided by the market price of the shares at the time of payout, encourages even greater alignment of executive incentives with shareholder interests and will appropriately incentivize and reward executives to improve long-term shareholder value.


value creation.

Table of Contents        Award ranges.

    In February 2010,2011, the Compensation Committee established the following 2011-2013 LTIP award ranges for the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan,named executive officers, shown as a percentage of actual annual base salaries onsalary as of January 1, 2010, for the named executive officers:3, 2011:

Name
 Minimum Target Maximum  Minimum
Threshold
 Target Maximum

Constance H. Lau

 70% 140% 280% 70% 140% 280%

James A. Ajello

 40% 80% 160% 40%   80% 160%

Chester A. Richardson

 35% 70% 140% 35%   70% 140%

Richard M. Rosenblum

 45% 90% 180% 45%   90% 180%

Richard F. Wacker

 40%   80% 160%

        Mr. Schools forfeited his participation in        Metrics and goals.    In February 2011 the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan when he resigned in September 2010. Mr. Wacker is not participating in the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan because he became employed at the bank after the start of this performance period.

        The Compensation Committee also approved the following long-term incentive goals for the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan2011-2013 LTIP performance period for each of the participating named executive officers.metrics, weightings, minimum thresholds, target and maximum goals. The executives listed together below share the same goals.

Name
 Weight Performance
Metric (1)
 Minimum
Threshold
 Target Goal Maximum Goal
Constance H. Lau
James A. Ajello
Chester A. Richardson
  50%HEI Total Return to Shareholders (2) 30th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index 50th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index 75th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index
             
   50%HEI 2-year Average Consolidated Net Income (3) $172 million $191 million $210 million
           
   100%       
           
             
Richard M. Rosenblum  40%HEI Total Return to Shareholders 30th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index 50th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index 75th percentile of the Edison Electric Institute Index
             
   30%HEI 2-year Average Consolidated Net Income (3) $172 million $191 million $210 million
             
   30%Utility Consolidated Return on 2-year Average Common Equity (4) 8.5% 9.1% 10.0%
           
   100%       
           
 
 
 Metric and Weighting (%) (1)
  
 Minimum
Threshold

  
 Target
  
 Maximum
  
   Constance H. Lau, James A. Ajello, Chester A. Richardson    
   HEI Total Shareholder Return (TSR) as percentile of Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Index (2) (50%)   30th percentile   50th percentile   75th percentile  
   HEI 3-year Average Consolidated Net Income (3) (50%)   $155 million   $175 million   $187 million  
   Richard M. Rosenblum              
   HEI TSR as percentile of EEI Index (2) (40%)   30th percentile   50th percentile   75th percentile  
   Utility Consolidated Return on Average Common Equity (ROACE)(4) (30%)   79%   84%   89%  
   Utility 3-year Average Consolidated Net Income (5) (30%)   $118 million   $131 million   $144 million  
   Richard F. Wacker              
   Bank Return on Assets (6) (40%)   1.05%   1.15%   1.25%  
   Bank 3-year Average Net Income (7) (40%)   $57 million   $62 million   $66 million  
   HEI TSR as percentile of EEI Index (2) (20%)   30th percentile   50th percentile   75th percentile  

(1)
The actual award will be at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. Any committee-authorizedCommittee-authorized adjustments of American Savings Bank orand Hawaiian Electric Company metrics wouldresults will be applied for purposes of calculating HEI metric results for the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan.results.

(2)
The Total Return to Shareholders performance measurement will beTSR is based on the relationship between HEI's total return and that of the Edison Electric InstituteEEI Index. The Total Return to ShareholdersTSR is the sum of

Table of Contents

    the growth in the price per share of HEI Common Stock as measured from the beginning of the performance period to the end, plus all dividends paid during the period, assuming reinvestment, divided by the beginning price of HEI Common Stock.



(3)
HEI 3-year Consolidated Net Income is the generally accepted accounting principleaverage over the performance period of HEI's GAAP net income, presented in HEI's annual financial statements adjusted for exclusions allowed by the Compensation Committee for American Savings Bank and Hawaiian Electric Company by the Compensation Committee and will be measured at the endCompany.

Table of the performance period based on the average net income for 2011 and 2012.

Contents

(4)
Utility Consolidated ReturnROACE as a percentage of allowed return is measured as the average consolidated return on 2-yearaverage common equity for the three-year period compared to the average consolidated allowed return on common equity as determined by the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission for the three-year performance period.

(5)
Utility 3-year Average Common Equity (ROACE)Consolidated Net Income is the average of Hawaiian Electric Company's GAAP consolidated net income over the Utility Consolidated ROACEperformance period, adjusted for 2011 and 2012. Utility Consolidated ROACEexclusions allowed by the Compensation Committee.

(6)
Bank Return on Assets is American Savings Bank's GAAP net income divided by its average total assets for the performance period, adjusted for exclusions allowed by the Compensation Committee. Average total assets is calculated by dividingaveraging the daily total assets for each day in the performance period.

(7)
Bank 3-year Average Net Income is the average of American Savings Bank's GAAP net income over the performance period, adjusted for exclusions allowed by the average common equity for each year. Average common equity is calculated by adding the common equity at the beginning of the period and common equity at the end of the period and dividing the result by two.Compensation Committee.

        The Compensation Committee chose the metrics and goals above goals to encourage long-term achievement of HEI earnings and enhancement of shareholder value. Shareholders, customers and employees all benefit when these goals are met. Total Shareholder Return to Shareholders is a performance measure to showshows the return on stock to an investor. Comparing HEI's total return is compared to that of the Edison Electric InstituteEEI Index of investor-owned electric companies. It is a primary measure that reflects the value created for HEI shareholders compared to that created by other investor-owned electric companies. Net income for each of HEI, the utility and the bank is a standard measurement of earnings for the year and supports the continued payment of HEI's dividend to shareholders. Utility Consolidated ROACE is a measure of the utility's ability to earn net income as a percentage of HEI's equity. As Utility Consolidated ROACE increases, it reduces the difference between the ROACE allowed by regulation and itsthe utility's actual ROACE, thus providing more income and thereby increasing the utilities'utility dividends to HEI. HEI, in turn, is made stronger financially and better able to maintain shareholder dividends and invest in value-enhancing investments, including reinvesting in the utilities. There is also a strong correlation between a higher Utility Consolidated ROACE and market value of HEI. Bank return on assets is a widely used performance metric to measure how effectively management uses assets to increase profitability.

        From a historical perspective, payouts are not easy to achieve, nor are they guaranteed, under the LTIP. HEI and its utility and bank subsidiaries face significant external challenges in the 2011-2013 performance period. Extraordinary leadership on the part of the named executive officers will be needed to achieve the long-term objectives required for them to earn the incentive payouts. The Compensation Committee believes the LTIP targets are challenging and that all stakeholders will benefit if HEI and its utility and bank subsidiaries are successful in achieving the goals listed above for the 2011-2013 performance period.

        HEI provides stock awards to the named executive officers are eligible to strengthen the linkage of executive compensation with improvement in shareholder value and promote executive retention.

        Long-term incentive awards in 2010 through 2012 were or will be paid at least partiallyreceive annual equity-based grants in the form of restricted stock as follows:

retention purposes.


Table of Contents

        The named executive officers are eligible to receiveRSUs granted in 2011 vest in equal annual equity awards as determined by the Compensation Committee. The intent of the annual equity awards program is to encourage executive retention by providing for equity compensation based on staying at the Company forinstallments over a specifiedfour-year period of time.

        In 2010, restricted stock units were granted to the named executive officers, except for Mr. Schools (who received no equity awards in 2010) and Mr. Wacker (who received an award of restricted stock as part of his signing bonus). With restricted stock units, no stock is issued or outstanding until the actual release of the shares at vesting. The restricted stock units awarded in 2010 vest four years after the grant date, except that monthly pro-rata vesting applies upon an executive's retirement, death or disability. The restricted stock units accrue dividend equivalents, until vested.which are paid in conjunction with the annual installment vesting. The 20102011 RSU grants of restricted stock unit awards and restricted stock specific to the named executive officers are summarized in the 20102011 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table and related notes below.

        The Compensation Committee determined the number of shares (or units) awarded in service vesting grants (versus shares that are performance based) in consultation with its compensation consultant and considering peer practices. Ms. Lau's restricted stock unit award total was determined after review of grants made to chief executive officers at peer companies and consideration of her total direct compensation compared to the peer group competitive median. The independent consultant also found that the equity grants to the other named executive officers are generally competitive with peers.

        The unvested value from the long-term incentive plan in restricted stock units is about twice the annual grant values, based upon the component allocation determined by the Compensation Committee to be appropriate, and which the Compensation Committee views as sufficient for retention purposes. The cliff vesting of the restricted stock units granted in 2010 ensures unvested value extends out four years with no pro-rata vesting before the vesting period ends (except when the participant's termination is due to retirement, death or disability), and therefore adds support for retention purposes. The restricted stock granted to Mr. Wacker as part of his signing bonus vests annually over a four-year period.

        HEI, providesHawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank provide retirement benefits to all eligible employees, including the named executive officers (other thanto promote financial security in recognition of years of service and to attract and retain high-quality leaders.

        Retirement benefits under these plans specific to the named executive officers as of December 31, 2010 are discussed in further detail in the 20102011 Pension Benefits table and related notes below.

        HEI provides named executive officers withand other executives the opportunity to participate in deferred compensation plans that allow them to defer compensation and the resulting tax liability.

year, so no matching contributions were made for him for 2011.

        Deferred compensation benefits under these plans specific to the named executive officers in 2010 are discussed in further detail in the 20102011 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table and related notes below.


    Do named executive officers have executive death benefits?

        The Executive Death Benefit Plan of HEI and Participating Subsidiaries, which provides death benefits to an executive's beneficiaries in the event of anthe executive's death while employed or after retirement, was closed to new participants effective September 9, 2009. These death benefits are provided to beneficiaries of named executive officersexecutives who were participantsparticipated in the plan prior to that date. In addition, the benefits to beneficiaries of participants who were employees as of such date were frozen (i.e., the plan was amended to foreclose any increase in death benefits that would occur due to salary increases after September 9, 2009). Under the original terms of the Executive Death Benefit Plan contracts with the participants as in effect before September 9, 2009, the death benefits were grossed up for tax purposes. This treatment was considered appropriate because the executive death benefit is a form of life insurance and traditionally life insurance proceeds have been tax-exempt. Ms. Lau and Messrs. Ajello, Richardson and Rosenblum are covered under the Executive Death Benefit Plan. Mr. Schools did not participate in the plan. Mr. Wacker is not covered under the plan because he became an HEI executive officer after September 9, 2009. Death benefits are discussed in further detail in the 20102011 Pension Benefits table and related notes below.


Table of Contents


    Do named executive officers have change-in-control agreements?

        The Compensation Committee and Board view change-in-control agreements to be an appropriate tool to recruit executives as an expected part of thetheir compensation package, to encourage the continued attention of key executives to the performance of their assigned duties without distraction in the event of a potential change in control and to assist in retaining key executives. Change-in-control agreements can also protect against executive flight during a transaction when key executives might, in the absence of the agreement, leave the Company and accept employment with competitors. Accordingly, each of the named executive officers has a change-in-control agreement, except that Mr. Schools' agreement expired upon his resignation from American Savings Bank.agreement.

        In recommendingAll of the terms of executive change-in-control agreements to the Board, the Compensation Committee varies the severance multiplier among executives, taking into account the executive's expected role in a potential transaction, value to the organization and fairness. The change-in-control agreements are double trigger, which means that the executives receive severance payments only if there is both a change in control and they lose their jobs as a result. The change-in-control Compensation Committee varies the severance multiplier among executives, taking into account the executive's expected role in a potential transaction, value to the organization and fairness. The


Table of Contents

agreements approved by the Compensation Committee provide for cash lump sum severance multipliers of three times for Ms. Lau and two times for Messrs. Ajello, Richardson, Rosenblum and Wacker. The multiplier is applied to the sum of the executive's annual base salary and annual bonus (determined to be the greater of the current target bonus or the largest actual bonus during the preceding three fiscal years). TheAggregate payments under these agreements are limited to the maximum amount deductible under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and there are no tax gross ups with respect to these agreements. Payment of the severance benefits areis conditioned on the Company receiving a release of claims by the executive.

        The change-in-control agreements have initial terms of two years and are automatically renewedrenew for an additional year on each anniversary unless 90 days' notice of nonrenewal is provided by either party, so that the protected period is at least one year upon nonrenewal. The agreements remain in effect for two years following a change in control. The change-in-control agreements define a change in control to meanas a change in ownership of HEI, a substantial change in the voting power of HEI's securities or a change in the majority of the composition of the Board following a consummation of a merger, tender offer or similar transaction. The change-in-control agreements for Messrs. Rosenblum and Wacker also define a change in control as a change in ownership of Hawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank, respectively. Change-in-control benefits specific to the named executive officers are discussed in further detail in the Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control section and related notes below.


    What other benefits do named executive officers have?

        HEI provides certain limited other compensation to the named executive officers because they are commonly provided to business executives in Hawaii, such as club memberships primarily for the purpose of business entertainment, or are necessary to recruit executives, such as relocation expenses or extra weeks of vacation, or because of legacy programs that have since been discontinued, such as preferential mortgage loans. HEI may, from time to time, reimburse for reasonable business-related expenses.

        HEI has eliminated nearly all tax gross ups. There are no tax gross ups on club membership initiation or membership fees, or in the change-in-control agreements for the named executive officers. As discussed under "Do named executive officers have executive death benefits?", tax gross ups of death benefits have been restricted to the executives who participated in the Executive Death Benefit Plan prior to September 9, 2009 (the date the plan was frozen). As noted in that discussion, such tax gross ups are pursuant to contracts in effect prior to September 9, 2009 and were considered appropriate because executive death benefits are a form of life insurance, the proceeds of which have traditionally been tax-exempt.

        In 2010,2011, each of the named executive officers had a Company-paid club membership for the primary purpose of business entertainment expected of executives in their positions. Ms. Lau continues to have a preferential rate mortgage loan from American Savings Bank, which ceased offering such loans to its employees and executives as of July 1, 2009.

        HEI has eliminated all tax gross-up practices where possible, particularly with respect to perquisites. HEI may, from time to time, reimburse for reasonable business-related expenses.        Messrs. Ajello and Rosenblum each received a signing bonus upon being hired in 2009 by HEI and Hawaiian Electric Company, respectively, subject to monthly pro-rata reimbursement in the event of a voluntary termination or termination for cause prior to the completion of 36 months of service. This reimbursement period ended as of January 2012. As part of their employment offers, Messrs. Ajello and Rosenblumthey also were extended special 3-year declining severance agreements


Table of Contents


that provideprovided that, in the event their employment iswas terminated without cause on or before the third anniversary of thetheir date of their hire, they willwould be paid a declining portion of their annual base salary and any target annual bonusincentive compensation amount, depending on the length of their service. These special agreements have now expired since three years have elapsed since the dates on which Messrs. Ajello and Rosenblum were hired. Such severance agreements are not uncommon when hiring experienced executives, especially from the mainland


Table of Contents

United States, who may have difficulty in finding other employment if their job is terminated within months of their hire and relocation. In order to recruit Mr. Rosenblum an experienced utility executive, Hawaiian Electric Company also agreed to give Mr. Rosenblum a credit ofreceived two years age andof additional credited service for purposes of calculating his retirement benefits under the HEI Excess Pay Plan. Messrs. Ajello and Richardson receive four weeks of vacation annually and Mr. Rosenblum also receivedreceives ten days of sick leave and four weeks of vacation as partannually, each of his offer, which is more than a newan employee with similar length of service would usually receive.

        For purposes Mr. Wacker receives 29 days of retention of Mr. Schools, who was instrumental to the success of the bank's performance improvement project, American Savings Bank agreed to purchase his residence in Honolulu (at its original purchase price of $3.635 million, less normal selling costs including brokers' commissions) by June 30, 2011 or, if earlier, his termination as an American Savings Bank employee, as long as Mr. Schools remained employed at American Savings Bank through the end of 2010 or such earlier date as the Company determined in its sole discretion. American Savings Bank purchased Mr. Schools' residence in August 2010 in connection with his voluntary resignation from the bank in September 2010.

        As part of Mr. Wacker's recruitment, he was granted four weeks of vacationpaid time off annually, upon commencement of his employment, which is more than a new employeeemployees with similar length of service below the senior vice president level would usually receive.

        Other thanSince the special severance agreements mentioneddiscussed above for Messrs. Ajello and Rosenblum have now expired, there are no separate severance agreements for theany named executive officers. The named executive officers wouldare eligible to participate in the same manner as all HEI, and Hawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank employees in the Company'stheir respective company's standard severance policy based on years of service to the Company. American Savings Bank has no severance plan or program applicable to its executives or employees.service.


Table of Contents





Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

        The following table shows the base salary, bonus (if applicable), grant date fair value of stock awards, nonequity incentive compensation under the 2010 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP) and under the long-term incentive plan for the period 2008-2010,compensation, change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings and all other compensation and benefits earned by the named executive officers during 2008, 2009, 2010 and 20102011 (as applicable). Only the amounts reported in the "Salary," "Bonus," and "Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns of the table represent cash compensation earned for the applicable year, which is comprised of base salary, annual incentive bonuses,awards, the cash portion of long-term incentive awards for the performance period ending in the applicable year and, to the extent applicable, the cash portion of a signing bonus awarded to a named executive officer in the year such executive was hired.


Table of Contents


20102011 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE*TABLE

Name and
2010 Principal Positions
 Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($) (1)
 Stock
Awards
($) (2)
 Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (3)
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($) (4)
 All Other
Compensation
($) (5)
 Total
($)
 
Constance H. Lau  2010  787,267    1,722,253  2,575,164  1,448,910  34,408  6,568,002 
 HEI President and Chief  2009  771,800    921,483  338,106  774,297  34,049  2,839,735 
 Executive Officer  2008  763,200    197,640  1,363,695  1,394,006  40,727  3,759,268 
 American Savings Bank
Chair
Hawaiian Electric Company
Chair
                         
  
James A. Ajello**  2010  436,333    597,479  203,830  180,636  25,741  1,444,019 
 HEI Senior Financial Vice  2009  389,583  250,000  255,509  223,889  157,041  209,912  1,485,934 
 President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer                         
  
Chester A. Richardson***  2010  357,000    447,715  563,568  178,365  16,605  1,563,253 
 HEI Senior Vice President,  2009  344,400    112,316  197,916  119,845  15,111  789,588 
 General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer  2008  317,600    37,058  246,492  89,487  125,768  816,405 
  
Richard M. Rosenblum****  2010  584,667    786,620  282,037  279,777  26,335  1,959,436 
 Hawaiian Electric Company  2009  580,000  250,000  348,916  322,289  435,513  149,881  2,086,599 
 President and Chief Executive Officer                         
  
Richard F. Wacker*****  2010  68,750  150,020  399,980  103,851      722,601 
 American Savings Bank                         
 President and Chief Executive Officer                         
  
Timothy K. Schools******  2010  366,667      1,743,442    147,752  2,257,861 
 Former American Savings  2009  550,000      528,000  85  73,121  1,151,206 
 Bank President  2008  541,667    98,820  632,400  19,682  87,339  1,379,908 
  
Name and
2011 Principal Positions
 Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($) (1)
 Stock
Awards
($) (2)
 Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (3)
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($) (4)
 All Other
Compensation
($) (5)
 Total
($)
 

Constance H. Lau

  2011  815,000    1,951,782  853,222  1,645,834  31,137  5,296,975 

HEI President and Chief

  2010  787,267    1,722,253  2,575,164  1,448,910  34,408  6,568,002 

Executive Officer

  2009  771,800    921,483  338,106  774,297  34,049  2,839,735 

American Savings Bank Chair
Hawaiian Electric Company Chair

                         
  

James A. Ajello*

  2011  473,750    891,260  313,980  231,273  23,469  1,933,732 

HEI Executive Vice

  2010  436,333    597,479  203,830  180,636  25,741  1,444,019 

President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  2009  389,583  250,000  255,509  223,889  157,041  209,912  1,485,934 
  

Chester A. Richardson

  2011  370,800    499,596  206,564  220,841  16,574  1,314,375 

HEI Executive Vice

  2010  357,000    447,715  563,568  178,365  16,605  1,563,253 

President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer

  2009  344,400    112,316  197,916  119,845  15,111  789,588 
  

Richard M. Rosenblum**

  2011  602,000    873,872  529,013  337,515  25,696  2,368,096 

Hawaiian Electric

  2010  584,667    786,620  282,037  279,777  26,335  1,959,436 

Company President and Chief Executive Officer

  2009  580,000  250,000  348,916  322,289  435,513  149,881  2,086,599 
  

Richard F. Wacker***

  2011  550,000    587,042  577,346    25,000  1,739,388 

American Savings Bank

  2010  68,750  150,020  399,980  103,851      722,601 

President and Chief Executive Officer

                         
  
*
Certain of the compensation figures for the named executive officers reported in the table above increased significantly in 2010 compared to 2009, due in large part to (i) a change in long-term incentive plan design to provide that awards for the 2010-2012 performance period will be paid 100% in HEI Common Stock and (ii) the completion in 2010 of American Savings Bank's multi-year performance improvement initiative. The 2010 amounts reported under "Stock Awards" increased from 2009 because the award under the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan (payable at the end of the three-year performance period only to the extent performance goals are met) will be paid 100% in HEI Common Stock (plus accrued dividends less applicable taxes), compared to 60% in cash and 40% in HEI Common Stock (plus accrued dividends less applicable taxes) for the award under the 2009-2011 long-term incentive plan, in order to encourage even greater alignment of executive incentives with shareholders' long-term interests. The increase in the amount reported under "Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation" for Ms. Lau for 2010 compared to 2009 reflects the fact that (i) Ms. Lau voluntarily waived a bonus of $753,999 that she earned for 2009 performance under the 2009 annual incentive plan and (ii) the long-term incentive plan award in 2010 (under the 2008-2010 long-term incentive plan and the 2008-2010 supplemental long-term incentive plan) was greater than the long-term incentive plan award in 2009 (under the 2007-2009 long-term incentive plan) because the levels of performance achieved in the 2008-2010 performance period reflected the completion of the bank's multi-year performance improvement initiative. The completion of this initiative in the 2008-2010 performance period also affected the 2010 amount reported under "Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation" for

Table of Contents

    Mr. Richardson and Mr. Schools. Messrs. Ajello, Rosenblum and Wacker did not participate in the long-term incentive plans for either 2007-2009 or 2008-2010 because they joined HEI after the beginning of the applicable performance periods. The change in Ms. Lau's pension value, reported under "Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings," increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to a decrease in the discount rate used to calculate pension benefits and due to the inclusion of one additional year of service in the calculation of the present value of her pension benefits. The calculation of the present value of pension benefits depends on a number of variables, which may differ significantly for individual named executive officers and which can change year to year depending on the assumptions used. See the additional notes below for further detail on the items reported in the above table.

**
Mr. Ajello joined HEI as Senior Financial Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer on January 26, 2009.

***
Mr. Richardson's annualized base salary as of January 1, 2009 of $321,400 was increased to an annualized base salary of $349,000, effective March 2, 2009, to reflect an increase in his responsibilities.

****
Mr. Rosenblum joined Hawaiian Electric Company as President and Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2009.

*****
Mr. Wacker joined American Savings Bank as President on November 15, 2010. His 2010 annualized base salary was $550,000.

******
Mr. Schools voluntarily resigned from American Savings Bank on September 10, 2010.

(1)
Bonus. Represents signing bonuses paid in cash that were not awarded under a nonequity incentive plan. BonusesCash incentive compensation awarded under nonequity incentive plans are reported under "Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation." Mr. Wacker received a signing bonus of $550,000 upon his hiring in 2010, which was paid $150,020 in cash and $399,980 in restricted shares.

(2)
Stock Awards. Stock awardsThese amounts represent the opportunity for executives to earn sharesaggregate grant date fair value of stock over a four-year vesting period or upon achievement of certain performance goals over a three-year period.awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Stock awards include restricted shares, restricted stock units and performance awards under the long-term incentive plan established during the applicable year to the extent any actual award at the end of the performance period will

Table of Contents

    be payable in stock. The grant date fair value of restricted shares granted to Mr. Wacker in connection with his hiring in 2010 was $399,980. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted to named executive officers in 2010 was: Ms. Lau $541,750; Mr. Ajello $226,000; Mr. Richardson $180,800; and Mr. Rosenblum $226,000. The grant date fair values of the performance awards under the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan are based upon the(based on probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, whichdate). See the 2011 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table below for the portion of the amount in the Stock Awards column above that is assumed to be the target level. The target valuecomposed of the2011 grants of restricted stock units and performance awards under the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan is: Ms. Lau $1,180,503; Mr. Ajello $371,479; Mr. Richardson $266,915; and Mr. Rosenblum $560,620.2011-2013 LTIP. Assuming achievement of the highest level of performance conditions, the maximum value of the performance awards payable in 2014 under the 2010-20122011-2013 long-term incentive plan is: Ms. Lau $2,360,964;$2,762,645; Mr. Ajello $742,916;$881,322; Mr. Richardson $533,789;$628,445; Mr. Rosenblum $1,266,183; and Mr. Rosenblum $1,121,263. Mr. Schools voluntarily resigned from American Savings Bank in September 2010 and forfeited all stock units and performance awards granted in 2010.Wacker $954,149. For a discussion of the assumptions underlying the amounts set out for the restricted shares, restricted stock units and performance awards, see Note 10 to HEI's Consolidated Financial Statements in HEI's 20102011 Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

(3)
Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation. This column includesThe table below shows 2011 EICP payouts and the following annual incentive awardsnonequity portion of the 2009-2011 LTIP payouts to named executive officers that were approved by the Compensation Committee and paid for 2010in February 2012. Three-year LTIP performance under HEI's Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EICP): Ms. Lau $625,202; Mr. Ajello $203,830; Mr. Richardson $166,770; Mr. Rosenblum $282,037; Mr. Wacker $103,851 and Mr. Schools $824,032. Long-term incentive plan awardsperiods end on December 31 of the applicable year; payouts are generally determined in the first quarter of each year for the three-year cycle ending on December 31 of the previous calendar year. This column also includes the following long-term incentive awards paid foryear. When they were established in 2009, the 2008-2010 performance period: Ms. Lau $1,949,962; Mr. Richardson $396,798 and Mr. Schools $919,410. The 2008-2010 long-term incentive awards2009-2011 LTIP award opportunities were paiddefined 60% in cash and 40% in shares (or 50% in cash and 50% in shares for the supplemental LTIP awards) of HEI Common Stock, (basedwith the number of shares of HEI stock determined based on the averageprice of the high and low sales prices of theHEI stock on the date the 2009-2011 award date).

opportunity was established. The number of shares actually earned and paid out, and the dividend equivalents on those shares (which were paid in cash), are not reported as 2011 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table above but are shown in the 2011 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table below.

Name
 2011 EICP ($) 2009-2011
LTIP ($)
 Total Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)

Constance H. Lau

 649,004 204,218 853,222

James A. Ajello

 251,505   62,475 313,980

Chester A. Richardson

 164,043   42,521 206,564

Richard M. Rosenblum

 430,355   98,658 529,013

Richard F. Wacker

 577,346  577,346

    In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission requirements, the Summary Compensation Table above reports nonequity incentive compensation in the year in which it was earned and equity-based incentive compensation in the year in which the incentive award opportunity was established. Since a portion of the payout for the 2009-2011 performance period (and prior three-year performance periods) was in cash and a portion was in equity, the cash portion was reported in the Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation column for 2011 (the year earned) and the equity portion was reported in the Stock Awards column for 2009 (the year the award opportunity was established). Beginning with the 2010-2012 performance period, 100% of the long-term incentive payout will be in equity, so 100% of the 2010-2012 and 2011-2013 long-term incentive plan award expected value (based on probable outcome of performance conditions) are reported in the Stock Awards columns for 2010 and 2011, respectively. At the same time, the actual cash portion of the long-term incentive plan payouts for the 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 long-term incentive plan performance periods are reported in the Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation column for 2010 and 2011, respectively. This causes the amount in the Total column in the Summary Compensation Table above to be greater than it would have been without the conversion to 100% of the long-term incentive plan payouts being in the form of equity.

(4)
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings. These amounts represent the increase in present value of the accrued pension and executive death benefits for each named executive officer from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011, December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008, respectively. This change in present value is not a current cash payment. It represents the change in value of pension and

Table of Contents

    executive death benefits, which are only paid after retirement or death, as applicable. The amounts shown can vary significantly from year to year based upon changes in the factors involved in calculating the present value of accrued pension and executive death benefits. This calculation is affected by changes in years of service, age, salary, discount rates and other actuarial assumptions. In 2010,2011, the discount rate used to calculate the present value of pension benefits decreased from 2009.2010. The discount rate reflects the market rates currently applicable to settling the benefit obligation or the rates of return on high quality fixed income securities at the measurement date. A reduction in the discount rate usually results in a greater present value of pension benefits owed to the named executive officer. For a further discussion of the applicable plans, see the 20102011 Pension Benefits table and related notes below.

    No named executive officer had above-market or preferential earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation for the periods covered in the table above.

(5)
All Other Compensation. The following table summarizes the components of "All Other Compensation" paid with respect to 2010:2011:

  
 Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits  
  
 
 
Name
 Relocation
Expenses
($)
 Preferential
Mortgage
Loan
Interest
($)
 Other
($)
 Payments
Received
Upon
Termination
($)
 Contributions
to Defined
Contribution
Plans
($)
 Total
All Other
Compensation
($)
 
 

Constance H. Lau

    23,209  11,199      34,408 
 

James A. Ajello

  4,746    20,995      25,741 
 

Chester A. Richardson

      16,605      16,605 
 

Richard M. Rosenblum

      26,335      26,335 
 

Richard F. Wacker

             
 

Timothy K. Schools

    19,785  17,125  92,222  18,620  147,752 
Name
 Preferential
Mortgage
Loan
Interest
($)
 Other
($)
 Contributions
to Defined
Contribution
Plans
($)
 Total
All Other
Compensation
($)

Constance H. Lau

 21,303   9,834  31,137

James A. Ajello

  23,469  23,469

Chester A. Richardson

  16,574  16,574

Richard M. Rosenblum

  25,696  25,696

Richard F. Wacker

  25,000  25,000

Table of Contents

        Additional narrative disclosure about salary, bonus, stock awards, option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings and other compensation can be found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

        The table below shows awards that may be made to the named executive officerscash award opportunities under the 20102011 annual incentive plan, for 2010 performance andequity award opportunities granted under the 2010-20122011-2013 long-term incentive plan for performance over the 2010-2012 period. Also shown are the2011-2013 period and payable in 2014 and restricted stock unit awards granted under the 1987 Stock Option and Incentive Plan in February 2010 and the restricted shares granted2011 under the 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan in December 2010.Plan.


Table of Contents


20102011 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)
(3)
  
 

  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Nonequity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
(3)
  
 

  
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#)
(3)
  
 Compensation
Committee
Action Date
(where differs
from Grant
Date)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Nonequity Incentive
Plan Awards (1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)
(4)
 
Name
 Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
  Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
(3)

Constance H. Lau

 2/11/10 EICP 333,498 666,995 1,333,900     2/04/11 EICP  366,750 733,500 1,467,000     

 2/08/10 LTIP       28,517 57,035 114,069  2/04/11 LTIP     22,866 45,731 91,463  1,381,300

 6/09/10 RSU       25,000 541,750  2/04/11 RSU        22,865 570,482 

James A. Ajello

 

2/11/10 EICP

 
108,025
 
216,050
 
432,100
 
 
 
 
 
  

2/04/11 EICP

 

 
136,500
 
273,000
 
546,000
 
 
 
 
 
 

 2/08/10 LTIP       8,973 17,947 35,893  371,478  2/04/11 LTIP     7,295 14,589 29,178  440,666 

 5/11/10 RSU       10,000 226,000  2/04/11 RSU        9,118 227,494 

 8/04/11 RSU 8/02/11       10,000 223,100 

Chester A. Richardson

 

2/11/10 EICP

 
88,700
 
177,400
 
354,800
 
 
 
 
 
  

2/04/11 EICP

 

 
92,700
 
185,400
 
370,800
 
 
 
 
 
 

 2/08/10 LTIP       6,448 12,895 25,790  266,915  2/04/11 LTIP     5,202 10,403 20,806  314,217 

 5/11/10 RSU       8,000 180,800  2/04/11 RSU        7,430 185,379 

Richard M. Rosenblum

 

2/11/10 EICP

 
176,900
 
353,800
 
707,600
 
 
 
 
 
  

2/04/11 EICP

 

 
210,700
 
421,400
 
842,800
 
 
 
 
 
 

 2/08/10 LTIP       13,777 27,553 55,107  560,620  2/04/11 LTIP     10,858 21,715 43,431  633,080 

 5/11/10 RSU       10,000 226,000  2/04/11 RSU        9,651 240,792 

Richard F. Wacker

 

11/15/10 EICP

 
28,336
 
56,672
 
113,344
 
 
 
 
 
  

2/04/11 EICP

 

 
220,000
 
440,000
 
880,000
 
 
 
 
 
 

 12/09/10 RS       18,009 399,980  2/04/11 LTIP     8,818 17,635 35,271  477,062 

Timothy K. Schools (5)

 

2/11/10 EICP

 
222,933
 
445,867
 
891,733
 
 
 
 
 
��

 2/08/10 LTIP       14,516 29,031 58,063    2/04/11 RSU        4,408 109,980 

EICP
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (annual incentive)

LTIP
Long-Term Incentive Plan (2010-2012(2011-2013 period)
RS
Restricted shares

RSU
Restricted stock unit

(1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Nonequity Incentive Plan Awards. Includes awardsShows possible cash payouts under the 2010 annual incentive plan2011 EICP based on meeting performance goals set in February 2011 at threshold, target and maximum levels. Actual payouts for the 2011 EICP are reported in the Summary Compensation Table above. See further discussion of the 2011 EICP, including performance goals, award levels and payouts in February 2011 under this plan under "Compensation Elements—What was HEI's 2010 annual incentive plan and were there any payouts under this plan?" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

(2)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards. Represents number of shares of stock that may be issued under the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan2011-2013 LTIP based upon the achievement of performance goals set in February 2011 at threshold, target and maximum levels and vesting at the end of the three-year performance period. Long-term incentiveLTIP awards are forfeited for terminations of employment during the vesting period, except for terminations due to death, disability and retirement, which allow for pro-rata participation based upon completed months of service after a minimum of 12 months of service in the performance period. Dividends accrue quarterly based on the actual dividend rate and are paid at the end of the performance period based on actual shares earned. See further discussion of the features of the awards2011-2013 LTIP, including performance goals, in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

(3)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units. Represents restricted shares and the shares underlying restricted stock unitsnumber of RSUs awarded in 2010. Restricted shares were awarded to Mr. Wacker2011 that will vest and be issued as part of his signing bonus. The restricted shares become unrestricted stock in four equal annual increments on the grant date anniversary and are forfeited to the extent restrictions have not lapsed before a termination of employment during the vesting period, except for a termination due to death or disability or termination without cause, which result in the shares becoming fully vested. Restricted stock units shown in the table contemplate that shares will be issued as unrestricted stock four years after the date of the grant if the awardee has remained with the Company until that time. The restricted stock unit awards are forfeited for terminations of employment during the vesting period, except for terminations due to death, disability or retirement, which result in monthlyallow for pro-rata vesting up to the date of these awards.termination. The primary purpose of the restricted shares and restricted stock unitRSU awards is retention and there are no conditions to vesting other than expiration of the applicable vesting period. Dividends on restricted shares are paid quarterly in cash. Dividend equivalent rights are accruedaccrue quarterly and are paid in cash at the end of the restriction period when the restricted stock unitsRSUs vest. See further discussion of RSUs in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

(4)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards. Grant date fair value for shares under the 2010-2012 long-term incentive plan are2011-2013 LTIP is estimated in accordance with the fair-value based measurement of accounting, as described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to calculate the amounts reported, see the discussion of performance sharesawards contained in Note 10 (Share-based compensation) to HEI's Consolidated Financial Statements in HEI's 20102011 Form 10-K. Grant date fair value for restricted shares and restricted stock unitsRSUs is based on the average of the high and low sales pricesclosing price of HEI Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of the grant of the award.

(5)
Mr. Schools voluntarily resigned from American Savings Bank in September 2010 and forfeited all participation in the 2010 awards.

Table of Contents


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 20102011 FISCAL YEAR-END

 
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units, or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested (#)
(3)
 Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units, or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested ($)
(2)
 
 
  
  
  
 Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options
  
  
 Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested (1)
 
 
  
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expira-
tion
Date
 
Name
 Grant
Year
 Exer-
ciseable (#)
 Unexer-
ciseable (#)
 Number
(#)
 Market
Value ($) (2)
 

Constance H. Lau

  2004  50,000     26.02  4/19/14         

  2004 DE  1,831       4/19/14         

  2005  50,000     26.18  4/07/15         

  2008           8,000  211,840     

  2009           34,500  913,560     

  2010           25,000  662,000  28,517  755,130 

  2011           22,865  605,465  22,866  605,492 
    

  Total  101,831         90,365  2,392,865  51,383  1,360,622 
  

James A. Ajello

  2009           9,000  238,320     

  2010           10,000  264,800  8,973  237,605 

  2011           19,118  506,245  7,295  193,172 
    

  Total           38,118  1,009,365  16,268  430,777 
  

Chester A. Richardson

  2008           1,500  39,720     

  2009           2,500  66,200     

  2010           8,000  211,840  6,448  170,743 

  2011           7,430  196,746  5,202  137,749 
    

  Total           19,430  514,506  11,650  308,492 
  

Richard M. Rosenblum

  2009           11,000  291,280     

  2010           10,000  264,800  13,777  364,815 

  2011           9,651  255,558  10,858  287,520 
    

  Total           30,651  811,638  24,635  652,335 
  

Richard F. Wacker

  2010           13,507  357,665     

  2011           4,408  116,724  8,818  233,501 
    

  Total           17,915  474,389  8,818  233,501 

 
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units, or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested ($)
(2)
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units, or
Other
Rights That
Have
Not Vested (#)
(3)
 
 
  
  
  
 Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options
  
  
 Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested (1)
 
 
  
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expira-
tion
Date
 
Name
 Grant
Year
 Exer-
ciseable (#)
 Unexer-
ciseable (#)
 Number
(#)
 Market
Value ($) (2)
 

Constance H. Lau

  2002  50,000      21.68  4/22/12         

  2002 DE  7,985        4/22/12         

  2003  50,000      20.49  4/21/13         

  2003 DE  4,790        4/21/13         

  2004  50,000      26.02  4/19/14         

  2004 DE  1,831        4/19/14         

  2005  50,000      26.18  4/07/15         

  2007            16,000  364,640     

  2008            8,000  182,320     

  2009            34,500  786,255  12,723  289,957 

  2010            25,000  569,750  57,035  1,299,828 
    

  Total  214,606          83,500  1,902,965  69,758  1,589,785 
  

James A. Ajello

  2009            9,000  205,110  3,892  88,699 

  2010            10,000  227,900  17,947  409,012 
    

  Total            19,000  433,010  21,839  497,711 
  

Chester A. Richardson

  2007            3,000  68,370     

  2008            1,500  34,185     

  2009            2,500  56,975  2,649  60,371 

  2010            8,000  182,320  12,895  293,877 
    

  Total            15,000  341,850  15,544  354,248 
  

Richard M. Rosenblum

  2009            11,000  250,690  6,147  140,090 

  2010            10,000  227,900  27,553  627,933 
    

  Total            21,000  478,590  33,700  768,023 
  

Richard F. Wacker

  2010            18,009  410,425     
    

  Total            18,009  410,425     
  

Timothy K. Schools

                     
    

  Total                   

DE
Dividend equivalents

All information presented has been adjusted for the 2-for-1 stock split in June 2004.

(1)
Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested. The 2007 restricted stock awards become unrestricted on April 12, 2011 for Ms. Lau and on December 11, 2011 for Mr. Richardson. The 2008 restricted stock awards become unrestricted on April 15, 2012. The 2009 restricted stock unit awards become unrestricted on February 20, 2013. The 2010 restricted stock unit awards become unrestricted on June 9, 2014 for Ms. Lau and on May 11, 2014 for Messrs. Ajello, Richardson and Rosenblum. The 2010 restricted shares award to Mr. Wacker becomes unrestricted in equal annual increments on the grant date anniversary of December 9 over the four year period beginning December 9, 2010. The 2011 restricted stock unit awards become unrestricted in equal annual increments over the four year period beginning February 4, 2011 for Ms. Lau, and Messrs. Richardson, Rosenblum and Wacker. 9,118 shares of the 2011 restricted stock units awards to Mr. Ajello become unrestricted in equal annual increments over the four year period beginning February 4, 2011 and 10,000 shares become unrestricted in equal annual increments over the four year period beginning August 4, 2011.

(2)
Market Value. Market value is based upon the closing price of HEI Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange of $22.79$26.48 as of December 31, 2010.2011.

(3)
Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested. Represents shares of HEI Common Stock that would be issued under the 2009-20112010-2012 and 2010-20122011-2013 long-term incentive plans based upon the achievement of performance goals at the minimum threshold level for the 2009-2011 plan and at the target level for the 2010-2012 plan at the end of the three-year performance periods.

Table of Contents


Option Exercises and Stock Vested

20102011 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

 
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized on Exercise
($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
 Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
 

Constance H. Lau

  100,581(1) 838,170  31,000(2) 718,115 

James A. Ajello

         

Chester A. Richardson

         

Richard M. Rosenblum

         

Richard F. Wacker

         

Timothy K. Schools

         

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
Value Realized on Exercise
($)
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized on
Vesting ($)

Constance H. Lau

112,775 (1)807,87116,000 (2)
  8,015 (3)
392,320
239,649

James A. Ajello

  2,451 (3)  73,285

Chester A. Richardson

  3,000 (2)
  1,668 (3)
  76,590
  49,873

Richard M. Rosenblum

  3,872 (3)115,773

Richard F. Wacker

  4,502 (2)  99,989

(1)
The options exercised by Ms. Lau were granted on April 24, 200022, 2002 and April 23, 200121, 2003 with exercise prices of $14.74$21.68 and $17.96,$20.49, respectively.

(2)
Represents the number of shares acquired on vesting on May 13, 2010of restricted stock and restricted shares. The following restricted stock and shares vested during the year: Ms. Lau 16,000 shares of restricted stock issued on April 13, 2006.12, 2007; Mr. Richardson 3,000 shares of restricted stock issued on September 17, 2007; and Mr. Wacker 4,502 shares, representing 25% of restricted shares issued on December 9, 2010.

(3)
Represents the number of shares acquired upon vesting of performance share awards under the 2009-2011 LTIP, which were payable in stock at the end of the performance period. The Compensation Committee certified the achievement of the applicable performance measures on February 7, 2012 and the shares are valued as of the date of payment. Accrued dividend equivalents were paid in cash based upon the shares received as follows: Ms. Lau $29,816; Mr. Ajello $9,118; Mr. Richardson $6,205 and Mr. Rosenblum $14,404. For further discussion of the payment of the performance shares, see discussion of "What was HEI's 2009-2011 long-term incentive plan and was there any payout?" above.

Table of Contents


Pension Benefits

        The table below shows the present value as of December 31, 20102011 of accumulated benefits for each of the named executive officers and the number of years of service credited to each such executive under the applicable pension plan and executive death benefit plan, determined using the interest rate, mortality rate and other assumptions described below, which are consistent with those used in HEI's financial statements (see Note 9 to HEI's Consolidated Financial Statements in HEI's 20102011 Form 10-K):


20102011 PENSION BENEFITS

Name
 Plan Name Number of Years
Credited
Service (#)
 Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($) (6)
 Payments During
the Last Fiscal
Year ($)
  Plan Name Number of Years
Credited
Service (#)
 Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($) (6)
 Payments During
the Last Fiscal
Year ($)

Constance H. Lau

 

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

 19.8 1,353,370   

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

 20.8 1,621,108 

 

American Savings Bank Retirement Plan (2)

 6.4 163,253   

American Savings Bank Retirement Plan (2)

   6.4    186,019 

 

HEI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (3)

 24.3 6,980,440   

HEI Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (3)

 24.3 8,032,541 

 

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

 2.0 370,688   

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

   3.0    592,497 

 

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

  415,511    

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

     496,931  

James A. Ajello

 

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

 1.9 138,384   

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

   2.9    222,351 

 

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

 1.9 105,024   

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

   2.9    180,660 

 

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

  94,269   

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

     165,939 

Chester A. Richardson

 

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

 3.3 213,004   

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

   4.3    309,996 

 

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

 3.3 87,763    

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

   4.3    140,823  

 

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

  145,772   

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

     216,561 

Richard M. Rosenblum

 

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

 2.0 133,097   

HEI Retirement Plan (1)

   3.0    212,048 

 

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

 4.0 436,498   

HEI Excess Pay Plan (4)

   5.0    588,150 

 

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

  145,695   

HEI Executive Death Benefit (5)

     252,607 

Timothy K. Schools (7)

 

    

Richard F. Wacker (8)

 

    

Richard F. Wacker (7)

 

   

(1)
The HEI Retirement Plan is the standard retirement plan for HEI and Hawaiian Electric Company employees. Normal retirement benefits under the HEI Retirement Plan for management employees hired before May 1, 2011, including the named executive officers, are calculated based on a formula of 2.04% × Credited Service (maximum 67%) × Final Average PayCompensation (average monthly base salary for highest thirty-six consecutive months out of the last ten years). The retirement plan for Hawaiian Electric Company bargaining unit employees is determined under a different formula per the collective bargaining agreement. Credited service is generally the same as the years of

Table of Contents